Claim · model-written summary
Pod sealant presence interacted significantly with harvest method across four locations.
- Taxon
- canola
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- pod sealante0
- Outcome
- interactionse0
- Value
- P <= 0.01e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significant interactions at the four locations between the presence and absence of the pod sealant and the harvest methods (P <= 0.01)”
t0“canola”
Title
Pod sealant and canola harvest methods for pod shattering mitigation
Anderson Luis Nunes; Joel Ascari; Lizandro Pereira; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2015
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect At ideal harvest time, windrowing and direct harvest gave higher yields.
- Recommendation At ideal harvest time, the authors deemed herbicides and pod sealant unnecessary to mitigate shattering.
- Intervention effect At later harvest, diquat or paraquat preharvest desiccation gave the best yields.
- Observation The pod sealant was described as the most effective method.
- Recommendation The authors advised against windrowing at an inappropriate time because seeds can shatter as plants dry.