Paper · 2010 · Journal of Northwest A&F University

Effect of different chemical ripening agents on photosynthetic physiology and yield and quality in rapeseed

Xiao WenNa; Kejin Zhou

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The study was done to explore the ripening effect of chemical ripening and its relationship with growth regulator.[Method] 8-10 d before the rape normal matured chemical ripening agents were sprayed,to study the characteristics of rape pod photosynthesis,chlorophyll content and the impact of yield and oil content.[Result] Diquat(A1,A2)had a greater impact on the chlorophyll content;Nonda(A3,A4)had less impact on the treatment,the yield of different ripening agent treatments,compared with the control,reduced to varying degrees,and 0.3% Diquat treatment cut 30.44%,0.5% CEPA+0.3% Diquat treatment cut 23.24%,0.15% ABA+0.5% Nonda,compared with the control of agricultural processing,cut up 10.45%,0.5% Nonda up to deal with farmers cut 5.91%,compared with the control.[Conclusion] 0.5% Nonda+0.15% ABA,or 0.1% Diquat+0.5% CEPA are recommended for chemical ripening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diquat had greater impact on rapeseed chlorophyll content.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
Diquate0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Diquat(A1,A2)had a greater impact on the chlorophyll content;Nonda(A3,A4)had less impact on the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonda had less impact on rapeseed chlorophyll content.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
Nondae0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Diquat(A1,A2)had a greater impact on the chlorophyll content;Nonda(A3,A4)had less impact on the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ripening agents reduced rapeseed yield to varying degrees relative to the control.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
different ripening agent treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of different ripening agent treatments,compared with the control,reduced to varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.3% Diquat treatment cut rapeseed yield by 30.44%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
0.3% Diquat treatmente0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
cute0
Value
30.44%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“0.3% Diquat treatment cut 30.44%,0.5% CEPA+0.3% Diquat treatment cut 23.24%,0.15% ABA+0.5% Nonda,compared with the control of agricultural processing,cut up 10.45%,0.5% Nonda up to deal with farmers cut 5.91%,compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield of different ripening agent treatments,compared with the control,reduced to varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% CEPA+0.3% Diquat treatment cut rapeseed yield by 23.24%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
0.5% CEPA+0.3% Diquat treatmente0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
cute0
Value
23.24%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“0.3% Diquat treatment cut 30.44%,0.5% CEPA+0.3% Diquat treatment cut 23.24%,0.15% ABA+0.5% Nonda,compared with the control of agricultural processing,cut up 10.45%,0.5% Nonda up to deal with farmers cut 5.91%,compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield of different ripening agent treatments,compared with the control,reduced to varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.15% ABA+0.5% Nonda cut rapeseed yield by 10.45%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
0.15% ABA+0.5% Nondae0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
cute0
Value
10.45%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“0.3% Diquat treatment cut 30.44%,0.5% CEPA+0.3% Diquat treatment cut 23.24%,0.15% ABA+0.5% Nonda,compared with the control of agricultural processing,cut up 10.45%,0.5% Nonda up to deal with farmers cut 5.91%,compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield of different ripening agent treatments,compared with the control,reduced to varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% Nonda cut rapeseed yield by 5.91%.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
0.5% Nondae0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
cute0
Value
5.91%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“0.3% Diquat treatment cut 30.44%,0.5% CEPA+0.3% Diquat treatment cut 23.24%,0.15% ABA+0.5% Nonda,compared with the control of agricultural processing,cut up 10.45%,0.5% Nonda up to deal with farmers cut 5.91%,compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield of different ripening agent treatments,compared with the control,reduced to varying degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–543 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

0.5% Nonda+0.15% ABA is recommended for chemical ripening of rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
0.5% Nonda+0.15% ABAe0
Outcome
chemical ripeninge0

Verbatim

e0

“0.5% Nonda+0.15% ABA,or 0.1% Diquat+0.5% CEPA are recommended for chemical ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

0.1% Diquat+0.5% CEPA is recommended for chemical ripening of rapeseed.

Taxon
rapeseedt0
Treatment
0.1% Diquat+0.5% CEPAe0
Outcome
chemical ripeninge0

Verbatim

e0

“0.5% Nonda+0.15% ABA,or 0.1% Diquat+0.5% CEPA are recommended for chemical ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

diquat · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

stage · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 24 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.