Paper · 2003 · Hubei nongye kexue

Investigation of fertilization on citrus in Hubei Province

LU Jian-wei

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An investigation of orange production and nutrients management on citrus was carried out in Hubei Province,one of the main citrus growth area in China,including 111 citrus orchards distributed in 13 counties It was showed that 91 9%,86 5% and 68 5% orchards was applied N,P and K fertilizer both in organic and/or inorganic fertilizer,and only 45 0% citrus was applied organic manure The average of N,P and K application rates (per tree and one year) were 0 38 kg N,0 18kg P 2O 5 and 0 13 kg K 2O,respectively Inorganic resource N,P and K account for 78 9%?72 2% and 61 5% N∶P 2O 5∶K 2O application ratio was 1∶0 47∶0 34 and inorganic fertilizer N∶P 2O 5∶K 2O ratio was 1∶0 43∶0 27 The result indicated that fertilizer application considerably increased orange yield Compared with the yield without nutrient application,N,P and K fertilization raised fruit yield by 58 2%,3 4% and 49 0% The nutrients application efficiency of N,P and K was 65 3 kg fruit per kg K 2O,and 30 5 kg fruit per kg N and 5 5 kg fruit per kg P 2O 5,respectively The investigation also demonstrated that foliar spray was a good measure for citrus nutrients management The percentage of KH 2PO 4,Urea,B and Zn spray was 35 3%,23 5%,19 6% and 13 7%,respectively The problems in citrus nutrients management were displayed as follow:(1)The difference of nutrients application rate was large in different areas and different orchards (2)Generally speaking,the nutrients application rate was low (3)The nutrients rate from organic manure was low and the percentage was small (4)The ratio of N∶P∶K was unbalanced especially K was too low (5)The nutrients distribution in different time was unsuitable especially in fruit expanding stage the nutrients application was too small In the end of the paper some suggestions were gave for citrus nutrients management

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K fertilizer were applied in 91 9%, 86 5% and 68 5% of citrus orchards, respectively.

Outcome
orchards was applied N,P and K fertilizere0
Value
91 9%,86 5% and 68 5%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“91 9%,86 5% and 68 5% orchards was applied N,P and K fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 45 0% of citrus received organic manure.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Outcome
applied organic manuree0
Value
45 0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 45 0% citrus was applied organic manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average annual N, P and K application rates per tree were 0 38 kg N, 0 18kg P 2O 5 and 0 13 kg K 2O, respectively.

Outcome
N,P and K application ratese0
Value
0 38 kg N,0 18kg P 2O 5 and 0 13 kg K 2Oe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The average of N,P and K application rates (per tree and one year) were 0 38 kg N,0 18kg P 2O 5 and 0 13 kg K 2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic sources accounted for 78 9%, 72 2% and 61 5% of N, P and K.

Outcome
Inorganic resource N,P and Ke0
Value
78 9%?72 2% and 61 5%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Inorganic resource N,P and K account for 78 9%?72 2% and 61 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N:P:K application ratio was 1:0.47:0.34, while the inorganic fertilizer ratio was 1:0.43:0.27.

Outcome
N∶P 2O 5∶K 2O application ratioe0
Value
1∶0 47∶0 34e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“N∶P 2O 5∶K 2O application ratio was 1∶0 47∶0 34 and inorganic fertilizer N∶P 2O 5∶K 2O ratio was 1∶0 43∶0 27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization raised orange fruit yield by 58 2% compared with no nutrient application.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
raisede0
Value
58 2%e0
Comparator
without nutrient applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the yield without nutrient application,N,P and K fertilization raised fruit yield by 58 2%,3 4% and 49 0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization raised orange fruit yield by 3 4% compared with no nutrient application.

Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
raisede0
Value
3 4%e0
Comparator
without nutrient applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the yield without nutrient application,N,P and K fertilization raised fruit yield by 58 2%,3 4% and 49 0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilization raised orange fruit yield by 49 0% compared with no nutrient application.

Treatment
K fertilizatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
raisede0
Value
49 0%e0
Comparator
without nutrient applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the yield without nutrient application,N,P and K fertilization raised fruit yield by 58 2%,3 4% and 49 0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application efficiencies were 65 3 kg fruit per kg K 2O, 30 5 kg fruit per kg N and 5 5 kg fruit per kg P 2O 5.

Outcome
nutrients application efficiencye0
Value
65 3 kg fruit per kg K 2Oe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrients application efficiency of N,P and K was 65 3 kg fruit per kg K 2O,and 30 5 kg fruit per kg N and 5 5 kg fruit per kg P 2O 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1024 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray was described as a good citrus nutrient management measure.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Outcome
foliar spray was a good measuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray was a good measure for citrus nutrients management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentages of KH 2PO 4, urea, B and Zn spray were 35 3%, 23 5%, 19 6% and 13 7%, respectively.

Outcome
KH 2PO 4,Urea,B and Zn spraye0
Value
35 3%,23 5%,19 6% and 13 7%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of KH 2PO 4,Urea,B and Zn spray was 35 3%,23 5%,19 6% and 13 7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1221 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The survey found large variation in nutrient rates among areas and orchards, generally low rates, low organic manure contribution, an unbalanced N:P:K ratio and insufficient application at fruit expansion.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Outcome
nutrients managemente0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The problems in citrus nutrients management were displayed as follow:(1)The difference of nutrients application rate was large in different areas and different orchards (2)Generally speaking,the nutrients application rate was low (3)The nutrients rate from organic manure was low and the percentage was small (4)The ratio of N∶P∶K was unbalanced especially K was too low (5)The nutrients distribution in different time was unsuitable especially in fruit expanding stage the nutrients application was too small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1744 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · CitrusResults differ

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · yield · CitrusPositive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

phosphorus · yield · CitrusResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.