Paper · 2004 · Europe PMC (PubMed Central)

Root-invading fungi of lucerne and winter wheat in the rotation system on the Loess Plateau

Yuxia Guo; Zhibiao Nan; Chunjie Li; et al.

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was carried out on root-invading fungi of lucerne (Medicago sativa) and winter wheat(Triticum aestivum)under the forage legume-cereal rotation systems on the Loess Plateau of eastern Gansu province, China. Roots of wheat and lucerne were sampled at spring jointing (spring branching), flowering, maturity and seedling or regrowth stage in 2002. Fungi were isolated from lucerne rootlets and the wheat root system. Pathogenicity of these root-invading fungi to lucerne and wheat were determined in the laboratory. Twenty-seven fungal species were isolated and identified from the field plots. Of which 26 fungi were isolated from wheat root and 23 fungi isolated from lucerne rootlets. Among the fungi isolated, 22 species were shared by both lucerne and wheat. They were Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium herbarum, Cylindrocarpon destructans, Fusarium acuminatum, F. avenaceum, F. decemcellulare, F. oxysporum, F. semitectum, F. solani, Fusarium sp., Fusicoccum aesculi, Gliocladium sp., G. roseum, Mucor sp., Penicillium sp., Papulaspora sp., Phoma medicaginis, Rhizoctonia sp., Selinia sp., Staphylotrichum sp., Stemphylium botryosum and Verticillium sp.. Four fungi including Bipolaris sorokiniana, Melasmia sp., Periconia sp. and Phytophthora sp. were only found in wheat root, and only one fungal species, Mycotypha sp was found in lucerne rootlets. However, the dominant species of the root-invading fungi in lucerne and wheat were different. The most common fungal species from lucerne, in order of decreasing frequency of isolation, were F. oxysporum (17.0%), Selinia sp. (15.4%), P. medicaginis (9.5%), F. solani (6.7%) and Cy. destructans (6.6%). The five most common fungi isolated from wheat were Periconia sp. (15.0%), Papulaspora sp. (12.1%), C. herbarum (5.4%), Rhizoctonia sp. (4.0%) and F. oxysporum (3.9%). The total percentage of fungi isolated from lucerne was higher than from wheat. The pathogenicity test results showed that all the fungi tested under the laboratory conditions had pathogenic effects on lucerne and wheat to some extent. In general, the pathogenicity of all the fungi tested was more severe on seeds and seedlings of lucerne than on those of wheat. Fungi isolated from lucerne rootlets including Selinia sp., F. oxysporum, F. solani, F. decemcellulare, S. botryosum, C. herbarum, F. avenaceum and P. medicaginis were pathogenic to lucerne seeds and seedlings. Compared to the not inoculated control, decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%, relative germination was decreased by 23.0%~57.0%, and the disease index was 63.8~89.5. Whereas only F. oxysporum and S. botrysum of fungi isolated from lucerne rootlets showed pathogenicity to wheat seedlings, the disease index was 89.5 and 63.8, respectively. The relative germination was decreased 31.0% by F. oxysporum. Fungi isolated from wheat including F. acuminatum, F. oxysporum, F. avenaceum, F. solani, Fusarium sp., Periconia sp.and Papulaspora sp. showed pathogenicity to seeds and seedlings of lucerne. Compared to the not inoculated control, the inoculation treatments resulted in 20.0%~41.0% decayed seeds. The relative germination was decreased by 8.0%~56.0%, and the disease index was 67.7~88.2. Only Fusarium sp. and B. sorokiniana of fungi isolated from wheat roots showed pathogenicity to wheat seedlings with disease index of 99.1 and 88.8, respectively. The relative germination was decreased 11.0% by B. sorokiniana.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-seven fungal species were identified from field plots.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Outcome
fungal species were isolated and identifiede0
Value
Twenty-seven fungal speciese0
Setting
field plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty-seven fungal species were isolated and identified from the field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-six fungi were isolated from wheat roots.

Organ / stage
wheat roote0
Outcome
fungi were isolatede0
Value
26 fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“26 fungi were isolated from wheat root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–647 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-three fungi were isolated from lucerne rootlets.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
lucerne rootletse0
Outcome
fungi isolatede0
Value
23 fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“23 fungi isolated from lucerne rootlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-two fungal species were shared by lucerne and wheat.

Outcome
species were sharede0
Value
22 speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“22 species were shared by both lucerne and wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four fungi were found only in wheat roots.

Organ / stage
wheat roote0
Outcome
only founde0
Value
Four fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four fungi including Bipolaris sorokiniana, Melasmia sp., Periconia sp. and Phytophthora sp. were only found in wheat root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycotypha sp. alone was unique to lucerne rootlets.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
lucerne rootletse0
Interactor
Mycotypha spMycotyphae0other
Outcome
was founde0
Value
one fungal speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Mycotypha
Mycotypha · InteractorMark Richman · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only one fungal species, Mycotypha sp was found in lucerne rootlets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant root-invading fungi differed between lucerne and wheat.

Outcome
dominant species of the root-invading fungie0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dominant species of the root-invading fungi in lucerne and wheat were different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1457 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. oxysporum was the most common isolate from lucerne at 17.0%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
F. oxysporume0
Value
17.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. oxysporum (17.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selinia sp. was isolated from lucerne at 15.4%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Interactor
Selinia sp.Seliniae0pathogen
Outcome
Selinia sp.e0
Value
15.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selinia sp. (15.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. medicaginis was isolated from lucerne at 9.5%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Interactor
P. medicaginise0pathogen
Outcome
P. medicaginise0
Value
9.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. medicaginis (9.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Periconia sp. was the most common wheat isolate at 15.0%.

Interactor
Periconia sp.Periconiae0pathogen
Outcome
Periconia sp.e0
Value
15.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Periconia
Periconia · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Periconia sp. (15.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1739 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papulaspora sp. was isolated from wheat at 12.1%.

Interactor
Papulaspora sp.Papulasporae0pathogen
Outcome
Papulaspora sp.e0
Value
12.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papulaspora sp. (12.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fungal isolation percentage was higher in lucerne than wheat.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
total percentage of fungi isolatede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total percentage of fungi isolated from lucerne was higher than from wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested fungi were pathogenic to lucerne and wheat under laboratory conditions.

Interactor
fungiFungie0pathogen
Outcome
pathogenic effectse0
Setting
laboratory conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the fungi tested under the laboratory conditions had pathogenic effects on lucerne and wheat to some extent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2069 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal pathogenicity was generally more severe on lucerne seeds and seedlings than wheat.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
seeds and seedlingse0
Interactor
fungiFungie0pathogen
Outcome
pathogenicitye0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pathogenicity of all the fungi tested was more severe on seeds and seedlings of lucerne than on those of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2086–2197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne-isolated fungi produced 21.0%~32.0% decayed lucerne seeds.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculated treatmentse0
Outcome
decayed seed percentagese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
21.0%~32.0%e0
Comparator
not inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2449–2515 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the not inoculated control, decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2409–2515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne-isolated fungi reduced lucerne relative germination by 23.0%~57.0%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculated treatmentse1
Outcome
relative germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
23.0%~57.0%e0
Comparator
not inoculated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative germination was decreased by 23.0%~57.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2517–2566 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2449–2515 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to the not inoculated control, decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2409–2515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne-isolated fungi gave lucerne a disease index of 63.8~89.5.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculated treatmentse1
Outcome
disease indexe0
Value
63.8~89.5e0
Comparator
not inoculated controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the disease index was 63.8~89.5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2572–2604 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2449–2515 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to the not inoculated control, decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2409–2515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-root fungi inoculation led to 20.0%~41.0% decayed lucerne seeds.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculation treatmentse0
Outcome
decayed seedse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
20.0%~41.0%e0
Comparator
not inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation treatments resulted in 20.0%~41.0% decayed seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3074–3139 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the not inoculated control, decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2409–2515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-root fungi decreased lucerne relative germination by 8.0%~56.0%.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculation treatmentse1
Outcome
relative germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.0%~56.0%e0
Comparator
not inoculated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative germination was decreased by 8.0%~56.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3140–3192 · show in text ↑
t0

“lucerne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“the inoculation treatments resulted in 20.0%~41.0% decayed seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3074–3139 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to the not inoculated control, decayed seed percentages in inoculated treatments were 21.0%~32.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2409–2515 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 22 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

137 papers: 121 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 121 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.