Abstract
A plot experiment of the peanut application effect with the different amount acid soil amendment was conducted to test the improvement effect and the best amount used on sloping-land in south.Results showed that compared to the treatment without the acid soil amendment of the sloping-land peanut,the length of the peanut main root and the biomass were increased by using the acid soil amendment,which were significantly increased from 9.5% to 19.6%.Furthermore the fruit quality,the crude fat and the thick protein content of the peanut was respectively increased from 2.6% to 5.2% and from 0.3% to 2.8%.Combined the output,the plant nutritional status,the growth target and the quality analysis of the peanut,the recommendation amount of the acid soil amendment on the sloping-land peanut was 60～65 kg per 667 m2.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendment increased peanut main root length by 9.5% to 19.6%.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- acid soil amendmente0
- Outcome
- length of the peanut main roote0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9.5% to 19.6%e0
- Comparator
- treatment without the acid soil amendmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared to the treatment without the acid soil amendment of the sloping-land peanut,the length of the peanut main root and the biomass were increased by using the acid soil amendment,which were significantly increased from 9.5% to 19.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendment increased peanut biomass by 9.5% to 19.6%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- acid soil amendmente0
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9.5% to 19.6%e0
- Comparator
- treatment without the acid soil amendmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared to the treatment without the acid soil amendment of the sloping-land peanut,the length of the peanut main root and the biomass were increased by using the acid soil amendment,which were significantly increased from 9.5% to 19.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Amendment increased peanut crude fat content by 2.6% to 5.2%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- acid soil amendmente1
- Outcome
- crude fate0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.6% to 5.2%e0
- Comparator
- treatment without the acid soil amendmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the crude fat and the thick protein content of the peanut was respectively increased from 2.6% to 5.2% and from 0.3% to 2.8%”
e1“using the acid soil amendment”
e2“treatment without the acid soil amendment”
Claim · model-written summary
Amendment increased peanut thick protein content by 0.3% to 2.8%.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- acid soil amendmente1
- Outcome
- thick protein contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.3% to 2.8%e0
- Comparator
- treatment without the acid soil amendmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the crude fat and the thick protein content of the peanut was respectively increased from 2.6% to 5.2% and from 0.3% to 2.8%”
e1“using the acid soil amendment”
e2“treatment without the acid soil amendment”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend 60～65 kg per 667 m2 amendment for sloping-land peanut.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Outcome
- recommendation amount of the acid soil amendmente0
- Value
- 60～65 kg per 667 m2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recommendation amount of the acid soil amendment on the sloping-land peanut was 60～65 kg per 667 m2”
The same questions in other papers
other · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
other · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →other · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.