Abstract
A pot experiment with tomato cv.Hongbaoshi grown on perlite and soil receiving liquid steeped chicken manure and liquid steeped peanut cake applied through drip irrigation system was conducted to find out the feasibility of this new application method of the two manures.As compared with tomato specific nutrient solution,under perlite culture,fruit yield of liquid chicken manure and peanut cake treatments was only 64.5% and 82.9% of that of nutrient solution,respectively.Under soil culture,fruit yield of liquid chicken manure and peanut cake treatments was 147.0% and 82.8% of that of nutrient solution,respectively.No significant difference of single fruit mass,contents of total soluble solids and titratable acids of fruits was observed among treatments. The dregs was 3.5% when chicken manure was steeped and most of the liquid could be injected into drip irrigation system.However,there was much more dregs(accounting for 74.0%) when peanut cake was steeped which made it unsuitable to be used in drip irrigation system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
In perlite, liquid chicken manure gave 64.5% of the tomato fruit yield under nutrient solution.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- liquid chicken manuree0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- onlye0
- Value
- 64.5%e0
- Comparator
- nutrient solutione0
- Setting
- perlite culturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under perlite culture,fruit yield of liquid chicken manure and peanut cake treatments was only 64.5% and 82.9% of that of nutrient solution,respectively”
t0“Tomato Growth”
Claim · model-written summary
In perlite, liquid peanut cake gave 82.9% of the tomato fruit yield under nutrient solution.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- peanut cake treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- onlye0
- Value
- 82.9%e0
- Comparator
- nutrient solutione0
- Setting
- perlite culturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under perlite culture,fruit yield of liquid chicken manure and peanut cake treatments was only 64.5% and 82.9% of that of nutrient solution,respectively”
t0“Tomato Growth”
Claim · model-written summary
In soil, liquid chicken manure gave 147.0% of the tomato fruit yield under nutrient solution.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- liquid chicken manuree0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Value
- 147.0%e0
- Comparator
- nutrient solutione0
- Setting
- soil culturee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under soil culture,fruit yield of liquid chicken manure and peanut cake treatments was 147.0% and 82.8% of that of nutrient solution,respectively”
t0“Tomato Growth”
Claim · model-written summary
In soil, liquid peanut cake gave 82.8% of the tomato fruit yield under nutrient solution.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- peanut cake treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Value
- 82.8%e0
- Comparator
- nutrient solutione0
- Setting
- soil culturee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under soil culture,fruit yield of liquid chicken manure and peanut cake treatments was 147.0% and 82.8% of that of nutrient solution,respectively”
t0“Tomato Growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Single fruit mass and fruit soluble solids and titratable acids did not differ significantly among treatments.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- single fruit mass,contents of total soluble solids and titratable acids of fruitse0
- Direction
- No significant differencee0
- Comparator
- among treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant difference of single fruit mass,contents of total soluble solids and titratable acids of fruits was observed among treatments”
t0“Tomato Growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Steeped chicken manure had 3.5% dregs, and most liquid could enter the drip irrigation system.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- chicken manuree0
- Outcome
- dregse0
- Value
- 3.5%e0
- Qualifier
- most of the liquid could be injected into drip irrigation systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The dregs was 3.5% when chicken manure was steeped and most of the liquid could be injected into drip irrigation system”
t0“Tomato Growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Steeped peanut cake had 74.0% dregs.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- peanut cakee0
- Outcome
- dregse0
- Direction
- much moree0
- Value
- 74.0%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was much more dregs(accounting for 74.0%) when peanut cake was steeped”
t0“Tomato Growth”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged steeped peanut cake unsuitable for drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- peanut cakee0
- Outcome
- unsuitable to be used in drip irrigation systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“peanut cake was steeped which made it unsuitable to be used in drip irrigation system”
t0“Tomato Growth”
The same questions in other papers
Arachis hypogaea · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.