Paper · 2020 · Scientific Reports

Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality

Lin Ye; Xia Zhao; Encai Bao; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
430
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The extensive use of chemical fertilizers poses serious collateral problems such as environmental pollution, pest resistance development and food safety decline. Researches focused on applying plant-beneficial microorganisms to partially replace chemical fertilizer use is increasing due to the requirement of sustainable agriculture development. Thus to investigate the possibility of a plant-beneficial Trichoderma strain and its bio-organic fertilizer product in saving chemical fertilizer application and in improving crop quality, a field trial and continuous pot experiments were carried out with tomato. Four treatments were set up: a reduced application of chemical fertilizer (75% of the conventional application) plus Trichoderma-enriched bio-organic fertilizer (BF), organic fertilizer (OF) or Trichoderma spore suspension (SS), with using the 100% rate of the conventional chemical fertilizer as the control (CF). The results showed that the total soluble sugar, Vitamin C and nitrate accumulations were, respectively, +up to 24%, +up to 57% and -up to 62% in the tomatoes of the BF treatment compared to those of the control (CF). And both of the pot and field trials revealed that reduced rates of chemical fertilizer plus bio-organic fertilizer produced tomato yields equivalent to those obtained using the 100% of the chemical fertilizer. However, application with the inoculant alone (SS) or combined with the organic fertilizer alone (OF) would lead to a yield decreases of 6-38% and 9-35% over the control. Since the increased abundance of soil microflora and the enhanced soil fertility frequently showed positive linear correlations especially in the BF-treated soils, we conclude that the efficacy of this bio-organic fertilizer for maintaining a stable tomato yield and improving tomato quality may be due to the improved soil microbial activity. Thus, the results suggest that the Trichoderma bio-organic fertilizer could be employed in combination with the appropriate rates of chemical fertilizers to get maximum benefits regarding yield, quality and fertilizer savings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF treatment increased tomato total soluble sugar by up to 24% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
BF treatmente0
Outcome
total soluble sugare0
Direction
+up toe0
Value
+up to 24%e0
Comparator
control (CF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total soluble sugar, Vitamin C and nitrate accumulations were, respectively, +up to 24%, +up to 57% and -up to 62% in the tomatoes of the BF treatment compared to those of the control (CF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF treatment increased tomato vitamin C by up to 57% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
BF treatmente0
Outcome
Vitamin Ce0
Direction
+up toe0
Value
+up to 57%e0
Comparator
control (CF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total soluble sugar, Vitamin C and nitrate accumulations were, respectively, +up to 24%, +up to 57% and -up to 62% in the tomatoes of the BF treatment compared to those of the control (CF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF treatment reduced tomato nitrate accumulation by up to 62% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
BF treatmente0
Outcome
nitrate accumulationse0
Direction
-up toe0
Value
-up to 62%e0
Comparator
control (CF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total soluble sugar, Vitamin C and nitrate accumulations were, respectively, +up to 24%, +up to 57% and -up to 62% in the tomatoes of the BF treatment compared to those of the control (CF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced chemical fertilizer plus bio-organic fertilizer maintained tomato yields equivalent to full chemical fertilizer in pot and field trials.

Treatment
reduced rates of chemical fertilizer plus bio-organic fertilizere0
Outcome
tomato yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
100% of the chemical fertilizere0
Setting
pot and field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both of the pot and field trials revealed that reduced rates of chemical fertilizer plus bio-organic fertilizer produced tomato yields equivalent to those obtained using the 100% of the chemical fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced chemical fertilizer plus Trichoderma inoculant alone decreased tomato yield by 6–38% against control.

Treatment
inoculant alone (SS)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
6-38%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“application with the inoculant alone (SS) or combined with the organic fertilizer alone (OF) would lead to a yield decreases of 6-38% and 9-35% over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced chemical fertilizer plus organic fertilizer decreased tomato yield by 9–35% against control.

Treatment
organic fertilizer alone (OF)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
9-35%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“application with the inoculant alone (SS) or combined with the organic fertilizer alone (OF) would lead to a yield decreases of 6-38% and 9-35% over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microflora abundance and fertility were positively linearly correlated, especially in BF-treated soils.

Interactor
soil microflorae0symbiont
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
positive linear correlationse0
Qualifier
BF-treated soilse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the increased abundance of soil microflora and the enhanced soil fertility frequently showed positive linear correlations especially in the BF-treated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1688 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Trichoderma bio-organic fertilizer with appropriate chemical fertilizer rates for yield, quality and fertilizer savings.

Treatment
Trichoderma bio-organic fertilizere0
Outcome
yield, quality and fertilizer savingse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the Trichoderma bio-organic fertilizer could be employed in combination with the appropriate rates of chemical fertilizers to get maximum benefits regarding yield, quality and fertilizer savings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2096 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 48 positive, 1 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 172 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 850 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.