Paper · 2011 · Acta Pratacultural Science

Evaluation of fruit energy value of Polygonum viviparum in the Aba Plateau.

Kuang Yu; Sun Feida; Gan You-min; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fruit yield,total sugar,and calorific value were chosen to study energy potential of Polygonum viviparum,in Hongyuan,Ruoergai and Songpan.The results showed that,1) Fruit yield and total sugar,differed significantly in 7 plots(P0.001),with levels in plot 3 significantly higher than in the other samples(fresh weight 117.222 g/m2,dry weight 46.226 g/m2).The highest total sugar was in plot 5(54.16%),and the average was 49.73%.The calorific value of fruits in plots 2,3 and 7 did not show regularity: the average was 15.85 MJ/kg.2) Correlation analysis showed that fruit dry weight had a significant negative correlation with altitude,but a significant(P0.05) positive correlation with coverage of P.viviparum and aboveground litter storage,while the impact of various factors on total sugar was not significant.3) Statistics for the grassland areas showed the fruit annual yield in Hongyuan is from 17 387.81 to 105 674.34 t(fresh weight),in Ruoergai it is from 15 172.04 to 92 208.01 t(fresh weight).The annual total sugar in Hongyuan is from 8 646.96 to 52 551.85 t,in Ruoergai it is from 7 545.06 to 45 855.04 t,P.viviparum is expected to become a potential wild carbohydrate energy plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield differed significantly among seven plots; plot 3 was higher.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
117.222 g/m2e0
Setting
plot 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield and total sugar,differed significantly in 7 plots(P0.001),with levels in plot 3 significantly higher than in the other samples(fresh weight 117.222 g/m2,dry weight 46.226 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar differed significantly among plots and was highest in plot 5.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Value
54.16%e0
Setting
plot 5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest total sugar was in plot 5(54.16%),and the average was 49.73%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“total sugar,differed significantly in 7 plots(P0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fruit calorific value was 15.85 MJ/kg.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
calorific value of fruitse0
Value
15.85 MJ/kge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The calorific value of fruits in plots 2,3 and 7 did not show regularity: the average was 15.85 MJ/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–528 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit dry weight was negatively correlated with altitude.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
fruit dry weighte0
Direction
negative correlatione0
Qualifier
altitudee0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit dry weight had a significant negative correlation with altitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–634 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit dry weight was positively correlated with plant coverage and aboveground litter storage.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
coverage of P.viviparum and aboveground litter storagee0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“a significant(P0.05) positive correlation with coverage of P.viviparum and aboveground litter storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–740 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Various factors had no significant impact on total sugar.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
total sugare0
Qualifier
various factorse0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“the impact of various factors on total sugar was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated annual fruit yield in Hongyuan ranged from 17 387.81 to 105 674.34 t.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
fruit annual yielde0
Value
17 387.81 to 105 674.34 te0
Setting
Hongyuane0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit annual yield in Hongyuan is from 17 387.81 to 105 674.34 t(fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–939 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated annual fruit yield in Ruoergai ranged from 15 172.04 to 92 208.01 t.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
fruit annual yielde0
Value
15 172.04 to 92 208.01 te0
Setting
Ruoergaie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit annual yield in Hongyuan is from 17 387.81 to 105 674.34 t(fresh weight),in Ruoergai it is from 15 172.04 to 92 208.01 t(fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1001 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated annual total sugar in Hongyuan ranged from 8 646.96 to 52 551.85 t.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
annual total sugare0
Value
8 646.96 to 52 551.85 te0
Setting
Hongyuane0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“annual total sugar in Hongyuan is from 8 646.96 to 52 551.85 t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated annual total sugar in Ruoergai ranged from 7 545.06 to 45 855.04 t.

Taxon
Polygonum viviparumBistorta viviparat0
Outcome
annual total sugare0
Value
7 545.06 to 45 855.04 te0
Setting
Ruoergaie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bistorta vivipara
Bistorta vivipara · TaxonUser:Victor M. Vicente Selvas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Polygonum viviparum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“annual total sugar in Hongyuan is from 8 646.96 to 52 551.85 t,in Ruoergai it is from 7 545.06 to 45 855.04 t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1115 · show in text ↑