Paper · 2013 · Redai yaredai zhiwu xuebao

Leaf Structure Characteristics of Eight Indigenous Greening Trees in Guangdong

Wenbin Li

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To reveal the effects of edge tropical and lower subtropical climatic conditions on indigenous trees in Guangdong Province,leaf structure characteristics of 8 indigenous greening species in Guangzhou and Zhanjiang were studied.The relationship between leaf mass per area(LMA) and leaf structure characters were analyzed.The results showed that leaf structure characters,i.e.,fresh weight(FW),leaf length,leaf width,average leaf width and dry weight(DW),leaf area and leaf moisture content,had significant differences between two cities without consistent pattern.Specific leaf area(SLA) of Elaeocarpus apiculatus,Pterocarpus indicus,Lagetstroemia speciosa and Khaya senegalensis had significant difference between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou(P 0.001),while did not SLA of Michelia alba,Dracontomelon duperreranum,Bauhinia variegata and Ficus virens var.sublanceolata.The thickness(TH) of upper and middle leaves of Bauhinia variegata,upper leaves of Ficus virens var.sublanceolata,Lagerstroemia speciosa and Dracontomelon duperreanum in Guangzhou were larger than those in Zhanjiang(P 0.05).LMA had significantly positive correlation with FW and DW,and significantly negative correlation with leaf moisture content.There were not significant relation between LMA and leaf area,average leaf width and ratio of width to length.The climate conditions of two climate zones in Guangdong are differ litter,which not enough to make consistent adaptive variation of leaf structure characteristics in indigenous greening tree species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf structure characters differed significantly between Guangzhou and Zhanjiang without a consistent pattern.

Taxon
8 indigenous greening speciese0
Outcome
leaf structure characterse1
Direction
had significant differencese1
Qualifier
without consistent patterne1
Setting
Guangzhou and Zhanjiange0

Verbatim

e0

“leaf structure characteristics of 8 indigenous greening species in Guangzhou and Zhanjiang were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–226 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf structure characters,i.e.,fresh weight(FW),leaf length,leaf width,average leaf width and dry weight(DW),leaf area and leaf moisture content,had significant differences between two cities without consistent pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–562 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Elaeocarpus apiculatus differed significantly between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou (P 0.001).

Taxon
Elaeocarpus apiculatusElaeocarpus obtusus subsp. apiculatuse2
Outcome
Specific leaf area(SLA)e2
Qualifier
P 0.001e2
Setting
Zhanjiang and Guangzhoue2

Verbatim

e2

“Specific leaf area(SLA) of Elaeocarpus apiculatus,Pterocarpus indicus,Lagetstroemia speciosa and Khaya senegalensis had significant difference between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou(P 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Pterocarpus indicus differed significantly between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou (P 0.001).

Taxon
Pterocarpus indicusPterocarpus indicuse2
Outcome
Specific leaf area(SLA)e2
Qualifier
P 0.001e2
Setting
Zhanjiang and Guangzhoue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pterocarpus indicus
Pterocarpus indicus · TaxonPing an Chang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Specific leaf area(SLA) of Elaeocarpus apiculatus,Pterocarpus indicus,Lagetstroemia speciosa and Khaya senegalensis had significant difference between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou(P 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Lagetstroemia speciosa differed significantly between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou (P 0.001).

Taxon
Lagetstroemia speciosae2
Outcome
Specific leaf area(SLA)e2
Qualifier
P 0.001e2
Setting
Zhanjiang and Guangzhoue2

Verbatim

e2

“Specific leaf area(SLA) of Elaeocarpus apiculatus,Pterocarpus indicus,Lagetstroemia speciosa and Khaya senegalensis had significant difference between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou(P 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Khaya senegalensis differed significantly between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou (P 0.001).

Taxon
Khaya senegalensisKhaya senegalensise2
Outcome
Specific leaf area(SLA)e2
Qualifier
P 0.001e2
Setting
Zhanjiang and Guangzhoue2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Khaya senegalensis
Khaya senegalensis · TaxonMarco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Specific leaf area(SLA) of Elaeocarpus apiculatus,Pterocarpus indicus,Lagetstroemia speciosa and Khaya senegalensis had significant difference between Zhanjiang and Guangzhou(P 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Michelia alba did not differ significantly between the two cities.

Taxon
Michelia albae3
Outcome
SLAe3

Verbatim

e3

“while did not SLA of Michelia alba,Dracontomelon duperreranum,Bauhinia variegata and Ficus virens var.sublanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Dracontomelon duperreranum did not differ significantly between the two cities.

Taxon
Dracontomelon duperreranume3
Outcome
SLAe3

Verbatim

e3

“while did not SLA of Michelia alba,Dracontomelon duperreranum,Bauhinia variegata and Ficus virens var.sublanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Bauhinia variegata did not differ significantly between the two cities.

Taxon
Bauhinia variegataBauhinia variegatae3
Outcome
SLAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bauhinia variegata
Bauhinia variegata · TaxonPeter1968 at English Wikipedia · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“while did not SLA of Michelia alba,Dracontomelon duperreranum,Bauhinia variegata and Ficus virens var.sublanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of Ficus virens var.sublanceolata did not differ significantly between the two cities.

Taxon
Ficus virens var.sublanceolataFicus virense3
Outcome
SLAe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus virens
Ficus virens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“while did not SLA of Michelia alba,Dracontomelon duperreranum,Bauhinia variegata and Ficus virens var.sublanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf thickness of Bauhinia variegata was larger in Guangzhou than in Zhanjiang (P 0.05).

Taxon
Bauhinia variegataBauhinia variegatae4
Organ / stage
upper and middle leavese4
Outcome
thickness(TH)e4
Direction
largere4
Qualifier
P 0.05e4
Comparator
Zhanjiange4
Setting
Guangzhoue4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bauhinia variegata
Bauhinia variegata · TaxonPeter1968 at English Wikipedia · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The thickness(TH) of upper and middle leaves of Bauhinia variegata,upper leaves of Ficus virens var.sublanceolata,Lagerstroemia speciosa and Dracontomelon duperreanum in Guangzhou were larger than those in Zhanjiang(P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf thickness of Ficus virens var.sublanceolata was larger in Guangzhou than in Zhanjiang (P 0.05).

Taxon
Ficus virens var.sublanceolataFicus virense4
Organ / stage
upper leavese4
Outcome
thickness(TH)e4
Direction
largere4
Qualifier
P 0.05e4
Comparator
Zhanjiange4
Setting
Guangzhoue4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus virens
Ficus virens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The thickness(TH) of upper and middle leaves of Bauhinia variegata,upper leaves of Ficus virens var.sublanceolata,Lagerstroemia speciosa and Dracontomelon duperreanum in Guangzhou were larger than those in Zhanjiang(P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf thickness of Lagerstroemia speciosa was larger in Guangzhou than in Zhanjiang (P 0.05).

Taxon
Lagerstroemia speciosaLagerstroemia speciosae4
Outcome
thickness(TH)e4
Direction
largere4
Qualifier
P 0.05e4
Comparator
Zhanjiange4
Setting
Guangzhoue4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lagerstroemia speciosa
Lagerstroemia speciosa · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The thickness(TH) of upper and middle leaves of Bauhinia variegata,upper leaves of Ficus virens var.sublanceolata,Lagerstroemia speciosa and Dracontomelon duperreanum in Guangzhou were larger than those in Zhanjiang(P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf thickness of Dracontomelon duperreanum was larger in Guangzhou than in Zhanjiang (P 0.05).

Taxon
Dracontomelon duperreanumDracontomelon duperreanume4
Outcome
thickness(TH)e4
Direction
largere4
Qualifier
P 0.05e4
Comparator
Zhanjiange4
Setting
Guangzhoue4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracontomelon duperreanum
Dracontomelon duperreanum · TaxonNguyễn Thanh Quang · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The thickness(TH) of upper and middle leaves of Bauhinia variegata,upper leaves of Ficus virens var.sublanceolata,Lagerstroemia speciosa and Dracontomelon duperreanum in Guangzhou were larger than those in Zhanjiang(P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1086 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf mass per area was significantly positively correlated with fresh weight and dry weight of the eight greening species.

Taxon
8 indigenous greening speciese0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
FW and DWe5
Direction
positive correlatione5

Verbatim

e0

“leaf structure characteristics of 8 indigenous greening species in Guangzhou and Zhanjiang were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–226 · show in text ↑
e5

“LMA had significantly positive correlation with FW and DW,and significantly negative correlation with leaf moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1210 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf mass per area was significantly negatively correlated with leaf moisture content of the eight greening species.

Taxon
8 indigenous greening speciese0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
leaf moisture contente5
Direction
negative correlatione5

Verbatim

e0

“leaf structure characteristics of 8 indigenous greening species in Guangzhou and Zhanjiang were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–226 · show in text ↑
e5

“LMA had significantly positive correlation with FW and DW,and significantly negative correlation with leaf moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1210 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf mass per area showed no significant relation with leaf area, average leaf width or width-to-length ratio.

Taxon
8 indigenous greening speciese0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
leaf area,average leaf width and ratio of width to lengthe6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Verbatim

e0

“leaf structure characteristics of 8 indigenous greening species in Guangzhou and Zhanjiang were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–226 · show in text ↑
e6

“There were not significant relation between LMA and leaf area,average leaf width and ratio of width to length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1320 · show in text ↑