Abstract
[Objective] The aim was to study the effects of mungbean- maize intercropping on their yield and agronomic characters,and to screen out the suitable mungbean- maize intercropping mode in semi- arid areas of western Heilongjiang Province. [Method] The pot test was used. And the mungbean- maize intercropping proportion was 1∶ 2,2∶ 4,4∶ 2,4∶ 6,6∶ 4,2∶ 1,resp.,taking maize and mungbean single culture as control. [Result]Compared with single culture,the intercropping had bigger production potential,increased the economic benefits, and the economic benefit of the treatment mungbean- maize intercropping proportion 6∶ 4 was the highest; In the mode of maize intercropping with mungbean,some agronomic characters of maize improved by magrginal utility,while some agronomic characters of mungdean weakened by anti- magrginal utility. [Conclusion] The suitable intercropping proportion of mungbean- maize was 6∶ 4 in semi- arid areas of western Heilongjiang Province.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Mungbean-maize intercropping had bigger production potential than single culture.
Verbatim
e0“effects of mungbean- maize intercropping on their yield and agronomic characters”
e1“The pot test was used”
e2“Compared with single culture,the intercropping had bigger production potential,increased the economic benefits”
Claim · model-written summary
Mungbean-maize intercropping increased economic benefits compared with single culture.
Verbatim
e0“effects of mungbean- maize intercropping on their yield and agronomic characters”
e1“The pot test was used”
e2“Compared with single culture,the intercropping had bigger production potential,increased the economic benefits”
Claim · model-written summary
The 6∶4 mungbean-maize intercropping proportion had the highest economic benefit.
- Taxon
- mungbean- maizee3
- Treatment
- mungbean- maize intercropping proportion 6∶ 4e3
- Outcome
- economic benefite3
- Direction
- higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“the economic benefit of the treatment mungbean- maize intercropping proportion 6∶ 4 was the highest”
Claim · model-written summary
Some agronomic characters of maize improved under maize intercropping with mungbean, by marginal utility.
- Treatment
- maize intercropping with mungbeane4
- Outcome
- agronomic characters of maizee4
- Direction
- improvede4
- Qualifier
- magrginal utilitye4
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“In the mode of maize intercropping with mungbean,some agronomic characters of maize improved by magrginal utility”
Claim · model-written summary
Some agronomic characters of mungbean weakened under maize intercropping, by anti-marginal utility.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae4 - Treatment
- maize intercropping with mungbeane4
- Outcome
- agronomic characters of mungdeane5
- Direction
- weakenede5
- Qualifier
- anti- magrginal utilitye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e4“In the mode of maize intercropping with mungbean,some agronomic characters of maize improved by magrginal utility”
e5“some agronomic characters of mungdean weakened by anti- magrginal utility”
Claim · model-written summary
The suitable mungbean-maize intercropping proportion in semi-arid western Heilongjiang was 6∶4.
Verbatim
e6“The suitable intercropping proportion of mungbean- maize was 6∶ 4 in semi- arid areas of western Heilongjiang Province”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna radiata · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
intercropping · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.