Paper · 2006 · Gansu Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effects of different media and culture conditions on rooting in vitro of test-tube plantlets of Vitis vinifera L.

Ziyi Cao

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of different culture conditions including different concentration of sucrose and agar added in media,different pH values, culture temperature and light intension on rooting in vitro of test-tube plantlets of Vitis vinifera L.were carried out.The results showed that the optimum concentration of sucrose for rooting was 15~20 g/L.pH value had significant effects on root number,root diameter,root length and root-shoot ratio of test-tube plantlets cultured with different media,pH value increased,root number and average root length decreased,root diameter and root-shoot ratio increased.Concentration of agar significantly affected the rooting of test-tube plantlets,the high agar concentration was the later root primordium produced,meanwhile,as concentration of agar increased,average root length and root-shoot ratio decreased,average root diameter and root number increased.Root number showed no significant differences among three temperature treatments,while the temperature increased,average root diameter decreased a little,average root length and root-shoot ratio increased first,but when temperature reached to 35 ℃,they decreased.With the increasing of light intension,number,length and diameter of root and root-shoot ratio were all increased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum sucrose concentration for rooting was 15–20 g/L.

Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
optimume0
Value
15~20 g/Le0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum concentration of sucrose for rooting was 15~20 g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pH reduced root number and average root length.

Treatment
pH valuee0
Outcome
root number and average root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“pH value increased,root number and average root length decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–549 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pH increased root diameter and root-shoot ratio.

Outcome
root diameter and root-shoot ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“root diameter and root-shoot ratio increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–594 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher agar concentration delayed production of root primordia.

Treatment
agar concentratione0
Outcome
root primordiume0
Direction
latere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the high agar concentration was the later root primordium produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing agar concentration decreased average root length and root-shoot ratio.

Treatment
concentration of agare0
Outcome
average root length and root-shoot ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“as concentration of agar increased,average root length and root-shoot ratio decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing agar concentration increased average root diameter and root number.

Outcome
average root diameter and root numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“average root diameter and root number increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–885 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root number did not differ significantly among three temperature treatments.

Treatment
temperature treatmentse0
Outcome
Root numbere0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Root number showed no significant differences among three temperature treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–966 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average root diameter decreased slightly as temperature increased.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
average root diametere0
Direction
decreased a littlee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“while the temperature increased,average root diameter decreased a little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1039 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average root length and root-shoot ratio initially increased with temperature, then decreased at 35 ℃.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
average root length and root-shoot ratioe0
Qualifier
35 ℃e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“average root length and root-shoot ratio increased first,but when temperature reached to 35 ℃,they decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing light intensity increased root number, length, diameter, and root-shoot ratio.

Treatment
light intensione0
Outcome
number,length and diameter of roote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“With the increasing of light intension,number,length and diameter of root and root-shoot ratio were all increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1262 · show in text ↑