Abstract
Effect of straw-decomposing inoculant on the growth,yield,decay rate of straw,soil microbe and soil fertility of maize was studied under field-and pot-experiment conditions.The results showed that using straw-decomposing inoculant in the stage of straw application significantly increased maize yield;with the application of straw-decomposing inoculant and less amount of straw returning,the maize yield underwent a significant increase compared to that of the yield in the treatments using large amount of straw returning.It showed that the straw returning by crushing in cooperated with straw-decomposing inoculant had a better yield-improving effect than straw returning by burning in maize.The application of straw-decomposing inoculant had obvious influences on increasing the number of soil microorganisms and promoting the straw decomposition;meanwhile,it could reduce the adverse impact of excessive straw returning on crop growth,and steadily increased the contents of soil nutrients.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculant application significantly increased maize yield.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using straw-decomposing inoculant in the stage of straw application significantly increased maize yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculant with less straw return yielded more than large straw return.
- Treatment
- straw-decomposing inoculant and less amount of straw returninge0
- Outcome
- maize yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- treatments using large amount of straw returninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the application of straw-decomposing inoculant and less amount of straw returning,the maize yield underwent a significant increase compared to that of the yield in the treatments using large amount of straw returning.”
Claim · model-written summary
Crushed straw plus inoculant improved yield more than burning straw.
- Treatment
- straw returning by crushing in cooperated with straw-decomposing inoculante0
- Outcome
- yield-improving effecte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- straw returning by burninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“straw returning by crushing in cooperated with straw-decomposing inoculant had a better yield-improving effect than straw returning by burning in maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculant increased soil microorganism numbers.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The application of straw-decomposing inoculant had obvious influences on increasing the number of soil microorganisms”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculant promoted straw decomposition.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“promoting the straw decomposition”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculant reduced the adverse effect of excess straw return on crop growth.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“it could reduce the adverse impact of excessive straw returning on crop growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculant steadily increased soil nutrient contents.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“steadily increased the contents of soil nutrients.”
The same questions in other papers
organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
534 papers more in this group
See all 538 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.