Paper · 2005

Effects of Flue-cured Tobacco Intercropping with Sweet Clover or Sweet Potato on Yield and Quality of Tobacco Leaves

Tang Shi-kai; Lifang Liu

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted to study the effects of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas ) intercropping, and flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover(Melilotus officinalis) intercropping on tobacco leaves yield and quality. The results showed that intercropping practice does not significantly influence the yield of tobacco leaves in comparison with monocropping. And compared with monocropping and intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potato, flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover intercropping increased the proportion of second grade leaves by 38.10% and 9.59% respectively, which are significant at P0.05. And compared with monocropping, intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potato, and flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover decreased the proportion of low-grade leaves by 12.61% and 2.39% respectively, which are significant at P0.05. Moreover, intercropping practice increased the contents of total sugar, reductive sugar and sugar/nicotine ratio, and decreased chlorine content in flue-cured tobacco leaves, making the leaves better in term of quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not significantly affect tobacco leaf yield versus monocropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
intercropping practicee0
Outcome
yield of tobacco leavese0
Direction
does not significantly influencee0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping practice does not significantly influence the yield of tobacco leaves in comparison with monocropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco–sweet clover intercropping increased second-grade leaves by 38.10% versus monocropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover intercroppinge0
Interactor
sweet clovere0other
Outcome
proportion of second grade leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38.10%e0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“compared with monocropping and intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potato, flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover intercropping increased the proportion of second grade leaves by 38.10% and 9.59% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco–sweet clover intercropping increased second-grade leaves by 9.59% versus sweet potato intercropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover intercroppinge0
Interactor
sweet clovere0other
Outcome
proportion of second grade leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.59%e0
Comparator
intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potatoe0

Verbatim

e0

“compared with monocropping and intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potato, flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover intercropping increased the proportion of second grade leaves by 38.10% and 9.59% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato intercropping reduced low-grade tobacco leaves by 12.61% versus monocropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potatoe0
Interactor
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0other
Outcome
proportion of low-grade leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12.61%e0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · InteractorEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potato, and flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover decreased the proportion of low-grade leaves by 12.61% and 2.39% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet clover intercropping reduced low-grade tobacco leaves by 2.39% versus monocropping.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
flue-cured tobacco and sweet clovere0
Interactor
sweet clovere0other
Outcome
proportion of low-grade leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.39%e0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Verbatim

e0

“compared with monocropping, intercropping of flue-cured tobacco and sweet potato, and flue-cured tobacco and sweet clover decreased the proportion of low-grade leaves by 12.61% and 2.39% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased total sugar, reductive sugar, and sugar/nicotine ratio.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
intercropping practicee0
Outcome
total sugar, reductive sugar and sugar/nicotine ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping practice increased the contents of total sugar, reductive sugar and sugar/nicotine ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased chlorine content in tobacco leaves.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
intercropping practicee1
Outcome
chlorine contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreased chlorine content in flue-cured tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping practice increased the contents of total sugar, reductive sugar and sugar/nicotine ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–985 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · quality: sugar starch · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.