Paper · 2013 · Xi'nan nongye xuebao

Two Kinds of Soil Improvement Measures for Preventing and Controlling Tobacco Bacterial Wilt

Fangfang Yan

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The lime(Ca(OH)2) and soil additives T-310 adjuste and were applied by two ways,including in the whole field broadcasting 15 days before transplanting and application per plant when transplanting,to improve soil planted tobacco with tobacco bacterial wilt(Ralstonia solanacearum).The results showed that,the lime and soil additives T-310 adjuste could reduce the incidence and bacterial wilt disease index in Xingwen County and Miyi County in Sichuan Province.Compared with CK,bacterial wilt incidence was decreased by 23.3% and 21.3% and the disease index was decreased by 20.2 and 17.The bacterial wilt incidence and disease index in soil with the lime(Ca(OH)2) and soil additives T-310 adjuste treatment were lower than that in soil with drug treatment.The lime(Ca(OH)2) and soil additives T-310 adjuste had no obviously negative effect on tobacco growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and T-310 reduced tobacco bacterial wilt incidence and disease index in two counties.

Treatment
lime and soil additives T-310 adjustee0
Outcome
bacterial wilt disease indexe0
Direction
reducee0
Setting
Xingwen County and Miyi County in Sichuan Provincee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lime and soil additives T-310 adjuste could reduce the incidence and bacterial wilt disease index in Xingwen County and Miyi County in Sichuan Province.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilt incidence and index with lime and T-310 were lower than with drug treatment.

Treatment
lime(Ca(OH)2) and soil additives T-310 adjuste treatmente0
Outcome
bacterial wilt incidence and disease indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
drug treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial wilt incidence and disease index in soil with the lime(Ca(OH)2) and soil additives T-310 adjuste treatment were lower than that in soil with drug treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and T-310 had no obvious adverse effect on tobacco growth.

Treatment
lime(Ca(OH)2) and soil additives T-310 adjustee0
Outcome
tobacco growthe0
Direction
no obviously negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lime(Ca(OH)2) and soil additives T-310 adjuste had no obviously negative effect on tobacco growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–858 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

lime · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.