Paper · 2011 · Shandi Nongye Shengwu xuebao

Effects of Different Fertilizer Application on the Growth of Flue-cured Tobacco under Humid Irrigation

Jianping Cheng

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of different fertilizer application on the growth of flue-cured tobacco(cv.Yunyan 85) under humid irrigation were studied in Changshun county,Guizhou Province.Four fertilizer application levels,i.e.,25.0 kg(Ⅰ),37.5 kg(Ⅱ),50.0 kg(Ⅲ) and 62.5 kg(Ⅳ) per 667 m2 were used in the present test.The result showed that the treatment Ⅱwith humid irrigation,a little bit lower to the amount for local production in large-scale application gave no significant differences on the yield of flue-cured tobacco compared with treatments,Ⅲ and Ⅳ.Treatment Ⅱin humid irrigation technique almost got the same yield with that applied more fertilizer of 50 kg/667 m2 without humid irrigation.It indicated that the humid irrigation technique might increase the utilization efficiency of water and fertilizers for improving the yield and quality of tobacco.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under humid irrigation, fertilizer treatment II had no significant yield difference from treatments III and IV.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
treatment Ⅱwith humid irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
treatments,Ⅲ and Ⅳe0

Verbatim

e0

“The result showed that the treatment Ⅱwith humid irrigation,a little bit lower to the amount for local production in large-scale application gave no significant differences on the yield of flue-cured tobacco compared with treatments,Ⅲ and Ⅳ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment II with humid irrigation gave nearly the same yield as 50 kg/667 m2 fertilizer without humid irrigation.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
Treatment Ⅱin humid irrigation techniquee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
almost got the samee0
Comparator
50 kg/667 m2 without humid irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment Ⅱin humid irrigation technique almost got the same yield with that applied more fertilizer of 50 kg/667 m2 without humid irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–79 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors inferred humid irrigation might improve water and fertilizer efficiency, yield, and quality.

Treatment
humid irrigation techniquee0
Outcome
utilization efficiency of water and fertilizerse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It indicated that the humid irrigation technique might increase the utilization efficiency of water and fertilizers for improving the yield and quality of tobacco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–842 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.