Paper · 2013 · Hubei nongye kexue

Effect of Different Period Fertilization on Soil Nutrients for Raspberry Planting

Lei Fu

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out to study the effect of different period fertilization on soil nutrients for raspberry planting with the N,P,K different ratio.The results showed that fertilization could obviously improve the total nitrogen,available phosphorus and available potassium,organic matters content of raspberry planting soil,and affect the soil pH.When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 60,45,75 kg / hm2respectively,soil nitrogen,available phosphorus,available potassium and organic matters content effectively could be obviously increased,and soil pH in the early growth of raspberry,the total nitrogen and available potassium in the medium and mature period as well.When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 40,45,50 kg / hm2respectively,available phosphorus and organic matters content in the mediun period,and available phosphorus in the mature period could all be increased significantly.When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 40,30,75 kg / hm2respectively,organic matter content in the mature period grow.When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 25,19,50 kg / hm2respectively,soil pH in the early and mature period decreased considerably and soil pH in the medium period increased greatly.Contribution of different fertilizer to the raspberry planting soil nutrients was phosphatic fertilizernitrogenous fertilizerpotash fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased total nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, and organic matter in raspberry planting soil.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
total nitrogen,available phosphorus and available potassium,organic matters contente0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“fertilization could obviously improve the total nitrogen,available phosphorus and available potassium,organic matters content of raspberry planting soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization affected soil pH in raspberry planting soil.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Outcome
soil pHe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“and affect the soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60,45,75 kg / hm2 nitrogen, phosphate and potash regime increased soil nutrients and organic matter in early raspberry growth.

Taxon
raspberrye0
Organ / stage
early growthe0
Treatment
nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 60,45,75 kg / hm2e0
Outcome
soil nitrogen,available phosphorus,available potassium and organic matters contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 60,45,75 kg / hm2respectively,soil nitrogen,available phosphorus,available potassium and organic matters content effectively could be obviously increased,and soil pH in the early growth of raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60,45,75 kg / hm2 regime increased total nitrogen and available potassium in the medium and mature periods.

Taxon
raspberrye0
Organ / stage
medium and mature periode0
Treatment
nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 60,45,75 kg / hm2e0
Outcome
total nitrogen and available potassiume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 60,45,75 kg / hm2respectively,soil nitrogen,available phosphorus,available potassium and organic matters content effectively could be obviously increased,and soil pH in the early growth of raspberry,the total nitrogen and available potassium in the medium and mature period as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40,45,50 kg / hm2 regime significantly increased available phosphorus and organic matter in the medium period and available phosphorus in the mature period.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 40,45,50 kg / hm2e0
Outcome
available phosphorus and organic matters contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
mediun period,and available phosphorus in the mature periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 40,45,50 kg / hm2respectively,available phosphorus and organic matters content in the mediun period,and available phosphorus in the mature period could all be increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40,30,75 kg / hm2 regime increased organic matter in the mature period.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Organ / stage
mature periode0
Treatment
nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 40,30,75 kg / hm2e0
Outcome
organic matter contente0
Direction
growe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 40,30,75 kg / hm2respectively,organic matter content in the mature period grow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25,19,50 kg / hm2 regime decreased soil pH in early and mature periods.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 25,19,50 kg / hm2e0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
early and mature periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 25,19,50 kg / hm2respectively,soil pH in the early and mature period decreased considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25,19,50 kg / hm2 regime increased soil pH in the medium period.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 25,19,50 kg / hm2e0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
medium periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the dosage of nitrogen,phosphate,potash fertilizer was 25,19,50 kg / hm2respectively,soil pH in the early and mature period decreased considerably and soil pH in the medium period increased greatly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1283 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors ranked phosphorus, nitrogen, and potash fertilizer contributions to raspberry planting soil nutrients in that order.

Taxon
raspberrye0
Outcome
Contribution of different fertilizer to the raspberry planting soil nutrientse0
Qualifier
phosphatic fertilizernitrogenous fertilizerpotash fertilizere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Contribution of different fertilizer to the raspberry planting soil nutrients was phosphatic fertilizernitrogenous fertilizerpotash fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1426 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.