Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Evaluation of real-time nutrient analysis of fertilized raspberry using petiole sap

Qianwen Lu; Carol Miles; Haiying Tao; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The time delay in receiving conventional tissue nutrient analysis results caused red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.) growers to be interested in rapid sap tests to provide real-time results to guide immediate nutrient management practices. However, sap analysis has never been conducted in raspberry. The present work aimed to evaluate the relationship of petiole sap nitrate (NO 3 – ), potassium (K + ), and calcium (Ca 2+ ) concentrations measured using compact ion meters and leaf tissue total nitrogen (TN), potassium (K), and calcium (Ca) concentrations measured using conventional tissue nutrient analysis. The relationship of petiole sap NO 3 – and leaf tissue TN concentrations with plant growth and production variables was also explored. Fertilizer treatments of urea were surface applied to raised beds of established “Meeker” floricane red raspberry plots at control, low, medium, and high rates (0, 34, 67, and 101 kg N ha –1 , respectively) in 2019 and 2020. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Whole leaves were collected from representative primocanes in mid- and late- July and August 2019 and 2020 (i.e., four sampling time points per year). At each sampling time point, a subsample of leaves was used for petiole sap analyses of NO 3 – , K + , and Ca 2+ concentrations using compact ion meters, and conventional tissue testing of leaf tissue TN, K, and Ca concentrations, respectively. There were no interactions between N fertilizer rate and year nor between N fertilizer rate and sampling time. No significant differences were found due to N fertilizer rate for petiole sap NO 3 – , K + , Ca 2+ nor leaf tissue TN, K, Ca concentrations. However, significant year and sampling time effects occurred in measured petiole sap and leaf tissue nutrient concentrations. Overall, the correlations between petiole sap NO 3 – and leaf tissue TN, petiole sap Ca 2+ and leaf tissue Ca, petiole sap K + and leaf tissue K concentrations were non-strong and inconsistent. Future research is warranted as the interpretation of correlations between raspberry petiole sap and leaf tissue nutrient concentrations were inconclusive.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole sap NO3, K+ and Ca2+ concentrations did not differ significantly with urea N rate in raspberry.

Taxon
red raspberryRubus idaeuse0
Treatment
N fertilizer ratee2
Outcome
petiole sap NO 3 – , K + , Ca 2+e2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“at control, low, medium, and high rates (0, 34, 67, and 101 kg N ha –1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–951 · show in text ↑
e2

“No significant differences were found due to N fertilizer rate for petiole sap NO 3 – , K + , Ca 2+ nor leaf tissue TN, K, Ca concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf tissue TN, K and Ca concentrations did not differ significantly with urea N rate in raspberry.

Taxon
red raspberryRubus idaeuse0
Treatment
N fertilizer ratee2
Outcome
leaf tissue TN, K, Cae2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“at control, low, medium, and high rates (0, 34, 67, and 101 kg N ha –1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–951 · show in text ↑
e2

“No significant differences were found due to N fertilizer rate for petiole sap NO 3 – , K + , Ca 2+ nor leaf tissue TN, K, Ca concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1709 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year and sampling time had significant effects on petiole sap and leaf tissue nutrient concentrations in raspberry.

Taxon
red raspberryRubus idaeuse0
Treatment
year and sampling timee3
Outcome
petiole sap and leaf tissue nutrient concentrationse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, significant year and sampling time effects occurred in measured petiole sap and leaf tissue nutrient concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1835 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Correlations between petiole sap NO3, K+ and Ca2+ and the matching leaf tissue TN, K and Ca were non-strong and inconsistent.

Taxon
red raspberryRubus idaeuse0
Organ / stage
petiole sape4
Outcome
correlationse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–113 · show in text ↑
e4

“Overall, the correlations between petiole sap NO 3 – and leaf tissue TN, petiole sap Ca 2+ and leaf tissue Ca, petiole sap K + and leaf tissue K concentrations were non-strong and inconsistent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2029 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.