Paper · 2009 · He'nan nongye daxue xuebao

Expression analysis of wheat chitinase gene Cht4 in the resistance and susceptible varieties to cereal cyst nematode

Yuan Hong-xia

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Expression analysis about wheat chitinase gene,in the different growing stages and different positions of different resistance cultivars after CCN inoculation,was carried by semi-Q RT-PCR,using wheat Actin gene as a control.The result showed that the quantity of chitinase gene expression obvious increased after 12 h inoculation,and there were no obvious differences between resistant and susceptible cultivars.After 36 h inoculation,the expression quantity in both cultivars increased obviously,and the quantity in resistant cultivars was more than susceptible cultivars,and in leaves was more than in roots.After 60 h inoculation,the gene expression quantity in resistant and susceptible cultivars was keeping a high level,and the former was more than the latter.The expression in susceptible cultivars after 84 h inoculation didn't have obvious difference from the ones without inoculation,but the expression quantity in resistant cultivars was still higher than those without inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 12 h of cereal cyst nematode inoculation, wheat chitinase gene Cht4 expression increased.

Treatment
12 h inoculatione1
Interactor
cereal cyst nematodeHeterodera avenaet1pathogen
Gene
Cht4t0
Outcome
chitinase gene expressione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera avenae
Heterodera avenae · InteractorPRG Wiki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the quantity of chitinase gene expression obvious increased after 12 h inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–329 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat chitinase gene Cht4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“cereal cyst nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 h after inoculation there was no obvious difference in chitinase gene expression between resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars.

Material
resistant and susceptible cultivarse2
Outcome
differences between resistant and susceptible cultivarse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“there were no obvious differences between resistant and susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat chitinase gene Cht4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 36 h of cereal cyst nematode inoculation, chitinase gene expression increased in both resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars.

Treatment
36 h inoculatione3
Interactor
cereal cyst nematodeHeterodera avenaet1pathogen
Gene
Cht4t0
Outcome
expression quantitye3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heterodera avenae
Heterodera avenae · InteractorPRG Wiki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“After 36 h inoculation,the expression quantity in both cultivars increased obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat chitinase gene Cht4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 · show in text ↑
t1

“cereal cyst nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 h after inoculation, chitinase gene expression was higher in resistant than in susceptible wheat cultivars.

Material
resistant cultivarse4
Outcome
quantitye4
Direction
moree4
Comparator
susceptible cultivarse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the quantity in resistant cultivars was more than susceptible cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat chitinase gene Cht4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 h after inoculation, chitinase gene expression was higher in leaves than in roots of wheat.

Organ / stage
leavese5
Outcome
expression quantitye3
Direction
moree5
Comparator
rootse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“After 36 h inoculation,the expression quantity in both cultivars increased obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–496 · show in text ↑
e5

“in leaves was more than in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat chitinase gene Cht4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 84 h after inoculation, chitinase gene expression in susceptible wheat cultivars did not differ from uninoculated plants.

Material
susceptible cultivarse6
Outcome
expressione6
Direction
didn't have obvious differencee6
Comparator
the ones without inoculatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The expression in susceptible cultivars after 84 h inoculation didn't have obvious difference from the ones without inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat chitinase gene Cht4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 84 h after inoculation, chitinase gene expression in resistant wheat cultivars remained higher than in uninoculated plants.

Material
resistant cultivarse7
Treatment
inoculatione7
Outcome
expression quantitye7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
those without inoculatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the expression quantity in resistant cultivars was still higher than those without inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat chitinase gene Cht4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–48 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.