Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Xip-I was not expressed in wheat flowering spikelets inoculated with Fusarium graminearum.

A claim from A Wheat Xylanase Inhibitor Gene,Xip-I, but NotTaxi-I, Is Significantly Induced by Biotic and Abiotic Signals That Trigger Plant Defense · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xip-I was not expressed in wheat flowering spikelets inoculated with Fusarium graminearum.

Organ / stage
flowering spikeletse1
Treatment
inoculated with Fusarium graminearume1
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Gene
Xip-Ie1
Outcome
Xip-I was not expressede1

Not reportedMaterialCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“are wheat (Triticum aestivum L) grain proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–63
e1

“Although Xip-I was not expressed in flowering spikelets inoculated with Fusarium graminearum, transcription of Xip-I was greatly enhanced in Erysiphe graminis-infected leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–651

Title

A Wheat Xylanase Inhibitor Gene,Xip-I, but NotTaxi-I, Is Significantly Induced by Biotic and Abiotic Signals That Trigger Plant Defense

Tomoko IGAWA; Takeshi TOKAI; Toshiaki KUDO; et al. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 2005. doi:10.1271/bbb.69.1058

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-3a38bf037ffc52635750c49f22b9bb0dfe45d424b776c7ac79f1283df5bc3c14 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Fusarium graminearum · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.