Paper · 2012 · Journal of Recent Advances in Agriculture

Study on Differentially Lipase Gene Expression against Different Inducers of Defense Response in Scab-Resistant and Susceptible Wheat Cultivars

F Bagheri Bajestani; S. Sanaz Ramezanpour; Hassan Soltanloo; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fusarium graminearum is the pathogenic agent of Fusarium head blight (FHB), which is a destructive disease on wheat and barley, thereby causing huge economic loss and health problems to human by contaminating foods. Chinese cultivar, sumai3, is one of the few wheat cultivars with resistance to scab. The expression pattern of lipase gene has been studied during wheat defense reaction to fungal extract, spore suspension, toxin (DON) and salicylic acid treatments in Scab-tolerant (Sumai3) and scab-susceptible (Falat) wheat cultivars. Infected spikes are sampled during 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 hours and 7 days after artificial inoculation and subjected to total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis. Quantitative Real-Time PCR was performed with specific primer to detect expression differences between tolerant and susceptible cultivars. Output data was analysed using REST software, indicated differences in expression level of cultivars during disease expansion cycle. We compared result from four expression pattern against different treatment for obtain the role of lipase gene in SAR cascade. Particulary observed aggregation of lipase transcripts in 6 hours to 7 days against F. graminearum spores suspension and they increased in 24 to 7 days against fungal extract in resistant variety. Also lipase transcripts increased in 6 and 72 hours against DON treatment in resistant variety. These increases observed whereas accumulate of lipase gene decreased in susceptible variety. This evidence can use for discover the SAR element in systemic reaction and can be base of other similar experiment to clear this mechanism.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipase transcripts accumulated from 6 hours to 7 days after F. graminearum spore suspension in the resistant variety.

Treatment
F. graminearum spores suspensione0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
lipase transcriptse0
Direction
aggregatione0
Qualifier
6 hours to 7 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aggregation of lipase transcripts in 6 hours to 7 days against F. graminearum spores suspension and they increased in 24 to 7 days against fungal extract in resistant variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Scab-Resistant and Susceptible Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipase transcripts increased from 24 hours to 7 days after fungal extract in the resistant variety.

Treatment
fungal extracte0
Outcome
lipase transcriptse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
24 to 7 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lipase transcripts in 6 hours to 7 days against F. graminearum spores suspension and they increased in 24 to 7 days against fungal extract in resistant variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipase transcripts increased at 6 and 72 hours after DON treatment in the resistant variety.

Treatment
DON treatmente0
Outcome
lipase transcriptse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
6 and 72 hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lipase transcripts increased in 6 and 72 hours against DON treatment in resistant variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipase gene accumulation decreased in the susceptible variety under these treatments.

Outcome
accumulate of lipase genee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
susceptible varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These increases observed whereas accumulate of lipase gene decreased in susceptible variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–143 · show in text ↑

Fusarium graminearum · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.