Paper · 2019 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Diazotrophic Paenibacillus beijingensis BJ-18 Provides Nitrogen for Plant and Promotes Plant Growth, Nitrogen Uptake and Metabolism

Yongbin Li; Yunlong Li; Haowei Zhang; et al.

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
77
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Diazotrophic bacteria can reduce N2 into plant-available ammonium (NH4+), promoting plant growth and reducing nitrogen (N) fertilizer requirements. However, there are few systematic studies on the effects of diazotrophic bacteria on biological N2 fixation (BNF) contribution rate and host plant N uptake and metabolism. In this study, the interactions of the diazotrophic Paenibacillus beijingensis BJ-18 with wheat, maize and cucumber were investigated when it was inoculated to these plant seedlings grown in both low N and high N soils, with un-inoculated plants as controls. This study showed that GFP-tagged P. beijingensis BJ-18 colonized inside and outside seedlings, forming rhizospheric and endophytic colonies in roots, stems and leaves. The numbers of this bacterium in the inoculated plants depended on soil N levels. Under low N, inoculation significantly increased shoot dry weight (wheat 86.1%, maize 46.6% and cucumber 103.6%) and root dry weight (wheat 46.0%, maize 47.5% and cucumber 20.3%). The 15N-isotope-enrichment experiment indicated that plant seedlings derived 12.9%-36.4% N from BNF. The transcript levels of nifH in the inoculated plants were 0.75-1.61 folds higher in low N soil than those in high N soil. Inoculation enhanced NH4+ and nitrate (NO3-) uptake from soil especially under low N. The total N in the inoculated plants were increased by 49.1%-92.3% under low N and by 13%-15.5% under high N. Inoculation enhanced activities of glutamine synthetase (GS) and nitrate reductase (NR) in plants, especially under low N. The expression levels of N uptake and N metabolism genes: AMT (ammonium transporter), NRT (nitrate transporter), NiR (nitrite reductase), NR, GS and GOGAT (glutamate synthase) in the inoculated plants grown under low N were up-regulated 1.5-91.9 folds, but they were not obviously changed under high N. Taken together, P. beijingensis BJ-18 was an effective, endophytic and diazotrophic bacterium. This bacterium contributed to plants with fixed N2, promoted plant growth and N uptake, and enhanced gene expression and enzyme activities involved in N uptake and assimilation in plants. However, these positive effects on plants were regulated by soil N status. This study might provide insight into the interactions of plants with beneficial associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterium colonized seedlings internally and externally.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Interactor
P. beijingensis BJ-18Paenibacillus beijingensise0symbiont
Outcome
colonized inside and outside seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GFP-tagged P. beijingensis BJ-18 colonized inside and outside seedlings, forming rhizospheric and endophytic colonies in roots, stems and leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–747 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial numbers depended on soil nitrogen.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
soil N levelse0
Outcome
numbers of this bacteriume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The numbers of this bacterium in the inoculated plants depended on soil N levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low nitrogen, inoculation increased maize shoot dry weight by 46.6%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
46.6%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize 46.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–921 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under low N, inoculation significantly increased shoot dry weight (wheat 86.1%, maize 46.6% and cucumber 103.6%) and root dry weight (wheat 46.0%, maize 47.5% and cucumber 20.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1009 · show in text ↑
e2

“the interactions of the diazotrophic Paenibacillus beijingensis BJ-18 with wheat, maize and cucumber were investigated when it was inoculated to these plant seedlings grown in both low N and high N soils, with un-inoculated plants as controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low nitrogen, inoculation increased cucumber shoot dry weight by 103.6%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
103.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber 103.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under low N, inoculation significantly increased shoot dry weight (wheat 86.1%, maize 46.6% and cucumber 103.6%) and root dry weight (wheat 46.0%, maize 47.5% and cucumber 20.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low nitrogen, inoculation increased wheat root dry weight by 46.0%.

Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede1
Value
46.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight (wheat 46.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under low N, inoculation significantly increased shoot dry weight (wheat 86.1%, maize 46.6% and cucumber 103.6%) and root dry weight (wheat 46.0%, maize 47.5% and cucumber 20.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low nitrogen, inoculation increased maize root dry weight by 47.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
47.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize 47.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under low N, inoculation significantly increased shoot dry weight (wheat 86.1%, maize 46.6% and cucumber 103.6%) and root dry weight (wheat 46.0%, maize 47.5% and cucumber 20.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low nitrogen, inoculation increased cucumber root dry weight by 20.3%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber 20.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under low N, inoculation significantly increased shoot dry weight (wheat 86.1%, maize 46.6% and cucumber 103.6%) and root dry weight (wheat 46.0%, maize 47.5% and cucumber 20.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1009 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings obtained 12.9%-36.4% of nitrogen from biological nitrogen fixation.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Outcome
N from BNFe0
Value
12.9%-36.4% Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant seedlings derived 12.9%-36.4% N from BNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1109 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low soil nitrogen produced higher nifH transcript levels in inoculated plants than high nitrogen.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Gene
nifHe0
Outcome
transcript levels of nifHe0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.75-1.61 foldse0
Comparator
high N soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transcript levels of nifH in the inoculated plants were 0.75-1.61 folds higher in low N soil than those in high N soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enhanced ammonium and nitrate uptake, especially under low nitrogen.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
NH4+ and nitrate (NO3-) uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation enhanced NH4+ and nitrate (NO3-) uptake from soil especially under low N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased total plant nitrogen by 49.1%-92.3% under low nitrogen.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
total Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49.1%-92.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total N in the inoculated plants were increased by 49.1%-92.3% under low N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1399 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased total plant nitrogen by 13%-15.5% under high nitrogen.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse2
Treatment
inoculatede1
Outcome
total Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13%-15.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 13%-15.5% under high N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1429 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total N in the inoculated plants were increased by 49.1%-92.3% under low N and by 13%-15.5% under high N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1430 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation enhanced glutamine synthetase and nitrate reductase activity.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
activities of glutamine synthetase (GS) and nitrate reductase (NR)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation enhanced activities of glutamine synthetase (GS) and nitrate reductase (NR) in plants, especially under low N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake and metabolism gene expression rose under low nitrogen.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
expression levels of N uptake and N metabolism genese0
Direction
up-regulatede0
Value
1.5-91.9 foldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression levels of N uptake and N metabolism genes: AMT (ammonium transporter), NRT (nitrate transporter), NiR (nitrite reductase), NR, GS and GOGAT (glutamate synthase) in the inoculated plants grown under low N were up-regulated 1.5-91.9 folds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1805 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These gene expression levels were not obviously changed under high nitrogen.

Taxon
wheat, maize and cucumberCucumis sativusTriticum aestivumZea mayse2
Treatment
inoculatede1
Outcome
expression levels of N uptake and N metabolism genese1
Direction
not obviously changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but they were not obviously changed under high N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1856 · show in text ↑
e1

“The expression levels of N uptake and N metabolism genes: AMT (ammonium transporter), NRT (nitrate transporter), NiR (nitrite reductase), NR, GS and GOGAT (glutamate synthase) in the inoculated plants grown under low N were up-regulated 1.5-91.9 folds, but they were not obviously changed under high N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1856 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat, maize and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–435 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: expression · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 109 positive, 12 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.