Paper · 2019 · PeerJ

Paenibacillus strains with nitrogen fixation and multiple beneficial properties for promoting plant growth

Xiaomeng Liu; Qin Li; Yongbin Li; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
130
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Paenibacillus is a large genus of Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic, endospore-forming bacteria. The genus Paenibacillus currently comprises more than 150 named species, approximately 20 of which have nitrogen-fixation ability. The N 2 -fixing Paenibacillus strains have potential uses as a bacterial fertilizer in agriculture. In this study, 179 bacterial strains were isolated by using nitrogen-free medium after heating at 85 °C for 10 min from 69 soil samples collected from different plant rhizospheres in different areas. Of the 179 bacterial strains, 25 Paenibacillus strains had nifH gene encoding Fe protein of nitrogenase and showed nitrogenase activities. Of the 25 N 2 -fixing Paenibacillus strains, 22 strains produced indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). 21 strains out of the 25 N 2 -fixing Paenibacillus strains inhibited at least one of the 6 plant pathogens Rhizoctonia cerealis , Fusarium graminearum , Gibberella zeae , Fusarium solani , Colletotrichum gossypii and Alternaria longipes . 18 strains inhibited 5 plant pathogens and Paenibacillus sp. SZ-13b could inhibit the growth of all of the 6 plant pathogens. According to the nitrogenase activities, antibacterial capacities and IAA production, we chose eight strains to inoculate wheat, cucumber and tomato. Our results showed that the 5 strains Paenibacillus sp. JS-4, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-10, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-14, Paenibacillus sp. BJ-4 and Paenibacillus sp. SZ-15 significantly promoted plant growth and enhanced the dry weight of plants. Hence, the five strains have the greater potential to be used as good candidates for biofertilizer to facilitate sustainable development of agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five Paenibacillus strains significantly promoted wheat growth and dry weight.

Treatment
eight strains to inoculate wheat, cucumber and tomatoe1
Interactor
Paenibacillus sp. JS-4e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and enhanced the dry weight of plantse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 5 strains Paenibacillus sp. JS-4, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-10, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-14, Paenibacillus sp. BJ-4 and Paenibacillus sp. SZ-15 significantly promoted plant growth and enhanced the dry weight of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“we chose eight strains to inoculate wheat, cucumber and tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five Paenibacillus strains significantly promoted cucumber growth and dry weight.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
eight strains to inoculate wheat, cucumber and tomatoe1
Interactor
Paenibacillus sp. SZ-10e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and enhanced the dry weight of plantse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 5 strains Paenibacillus sp. JS-4, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-10, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-14, Paenibacillus sp. BJ-4 and Paenibacillus sp. SZ-15 significantly promoted plant growth and enhanced the dry weight of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“we chose eight strains to inoculate wheat, cucumber and tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five Paenibacillus strains significantly promoted tomato growth and dry weight.

Treatment
eight strains to inoculate wheat, cucumber and tomatoe1
Interactor
Paenibacillus sp. SZ-14e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and enhanced the dry weight of plantse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 5 strains Paenibacillus sp. JS-4, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-10, Paenibacillus sp. SZ-14, Paenibacillus sp. BJ-4 and Paenibacillus sp. SZ-15 significantly promoted plant growth and enhanced the dry weight of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“we chose eight strains to inoculate wheat, cucumber and tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1277 · show in text ↑

Cucumis sativus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Solanum lycopersicum · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Triticum aestivum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Cucumis sativus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Solanum lycopersicum · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Triticum aestivum · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 109 positive, 12 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.