Paper · 2010 · Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica

Effect of Cucurbita moschata Hybrids Rootstock on the Growth of Grafted Cucumber Seedling

Xie Zhen-wei

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The compatibility and growth of grafted seedling which 3 C.moschata hybrids(including 360-3×112-2,077-2×112-2,360-3×635-1,which were screened out salt-tolerant hybrids at pre-stage test) and C.ficifolia as rootstocks,cucumber cultivar of Jinchun 2 as scion were studied by approach grafting and sprout insertion grafting using pot cultivation in greenhouse.The results showed that 3 C.moschata hybrid rootstocks were compatible with Jinchun 2 cucumber cultivar,but with lower survival rates than C.ficifolia rootstocks,differences in hypocotyls diameter and height between C.moschata hybrids and C.ficifolia rootstocks reduced the survival ratio of grafts,while with higher survival ratio of grafts by sprout insertion grafting than approach grafting.360-3×112-2 and 360-3×635-1 hybrids have the basic conditions of cucumber rootstock for their average leaf number,the largest leaf area,the fresh weight of roots and tops of grafted seedling no less than that of C.ficifolia rootstocks after grafting 20 days.And 360-3×112-2 hybrid would be a cucumber rootstock in vegetable production for it′s grafted seedling with higher root-top ratio and stronger.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three C. moschata hybrid rootstocks were compatible with cucumber cultivar Jinchun 2

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Jinchun 2e1
Outcome
compatiblee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“3 C.moschata hybrid rootstocks were compatible with Jinchun 2 cucumber cultivar,but with lower survival rates than C.ficifolia rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. moschata hybrid rootstocks gave lower graft survival rates than C. ficifolia rootstocks in cucumber

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
C.moschata hybrid rootstockse1
Outcome
survival ratese1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
C.ficifolia rootstockse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“3 C.moschata hybrid rootstocks were compatible with Jinchun 2 cucumber cultivar,but with lower survival rates than C.ficifolia rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypocotyl diameter and height differences between C. moschata hybrids and C. ficifolia rootstocks reduced graft survival ratio in cucumber

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
survival ratio of graftse2
Qualifier
differences in hypocotyls diameter and height between C.moschata hybrids and C.ficifolia rootstockse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“differences in hypocotyls diameter and height between C.moschata hybrids and C.ficifolia rootstocks reduced the survival ratio of grafts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprout insertion grafting gave higher graft survival ratio than approach grafting in cucumber

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
sprout insertion graftinge3
Outcome
survival ratio of graftse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
approach graftinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“while with higher survival ratio of grafts by sprout insertion grafting than approach grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 360-3×112-2 grafted cucumber seedlings had fresh weight of roots and tops no less than C. ficifolia after 20 days

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
360-3×112-2e4
Outcome
fresh weight of roots and tops of grafted seedlinge4
Direction
no less thane4
Qualifier
after grafting 20 dayse4
Comparator
C.ficifolia rootstockse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“360-3×112-2 and 360-3×635-1 hybrids have the basic conditions of cucumber rootstock for their average leaf number,the largest leaf area,the fresh weight of roots and tops of grafted seedling no less than that of C.ficifolia rootstocks after grafting 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 360-3×635-1 grafted cucumber seedlings had fresh weight of roots and tops no less than C. ficifolia after 20 days

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
360-3×635-1e4
Outcome
fresh weight of roots and tops of grafted seedlinge4
Direction
no less thane4
Qualifier
after grafting 20 dayse4
Comparator
C.ficifolia rootstockse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“360-3×112-2 and 360-3×635-1 hybrids have the basic conditions of cucumber rootstock for their average leaf number,the largest leaf area,the fresh weight of roots and tops of grafted seedling no less than that of C.ficifolia rootstocks after grafting 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 360-3×112-2 grafted cucumber seedlings had larger leaf area than C. ficifolia

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
360-3×112-2e4
Outcome
leaf areae4
Direction
largeste4
Comparator
C.ficifolia rootstockse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“360-3×112-2 and 360-3×635-1 hybrids have the basic conditions of cucumber rootstock for their average leaf number,the largest leaf area,the fresh weight of roots and tops of grafted seedling no less than that of C.ficifolia rootstocks after grafting 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 360-3×635-1 grafted cucumber seedlings had larger leaf area than C. ficifolia

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
360-3×635-1e4
Outcome
leaf areae4
Direction
largeste4
Comparator
C.ficifolia rootstockse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“360-3×112-2 and 360-3×635-1 hybrids have the basic conditions of cucumber rootstock for their average leaf number,the largest leaf area,the fresh weight of roots and tops of grafted seedling no less than that of C.ficifolia rootstocks after grafting 20 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 360-3×112-2 is suited as a cucumber rootstock in vegetable production

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
360-3×112-2e5
Outcome
would be a cucumber rootstock in vegetable productione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“360-3×112-2 hybrid would be a cucumber rootstock in vegetable production for it′s grafted seedling with higher root-top ratio and stronger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid 360-3×112-2 grafted seedlings had higher root-top ratio

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
360-3×112-2e5
Outcome
root-top ratioe5
Direction
highere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“360-3×112-2 hybrid would be a cucumber rootstock in vegetable production for it′s grafted seedling with higher root-top ratio and stronger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grafted Cucumber Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–89 · show in text ↑

grafting · survival · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.