Paper · 2012 · Guangxi Forestry Science

Experiment of Multi-species Afforestation in Huashan Forest Farm of Huanjiang County

Jie Jia

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The comparative experiment of multi-species afforestation which included Eucalyptus,Pinus massoniana,P.elliottii,Liquidambar formosana,Toona sinensis,Schima spp.,Acermono maxim,Symingtonia populnea,Rhodoleia championii was conducted in huashan forest farm of huanjiang county.The results showed that the tree species of the highest growth rate was Eucalyptus which was suitable for short rotation and Pinus massoniana and P.elliottii behaved well which could maintain high growth for six years.The state of Liquidambar formosana,Toona sinensis and Schima spp.was common,and the growth rate of Acermono maxim was low which was not suitable for fast-growing species and could be cultivated as ornamental species.The environmental adaptability of Symingtonia populnea and Rhodoleia championii was poor,of which the survival rate and retentional rate were low.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus had the highest growth rate among the tested tree species and is suitable for short rotation.

Taxon
EucalyptusEucalyptuse1
Outcome
growth ratee1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
suitable for short rotatione1
Setting
huashan forest farm of huanjiang countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus
Eucalyptus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)W. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The comparative experiment of multi-species afforestation which included Eucalyptus,Pinus massoniana,P.elliottii,Liquidambar formosana,Toona sinensis,Schima spp.,Acermono maxim,Symingtonia populnea,Rhodoleia championii was conducted in huashan forest farm of huanjiang county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–275 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the tree species of the highest growth rate was Eucalyptus which was suitable for short rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinus massoniana and P. elliottii behaved well and maintained high growth for six years.

Taxon
Pinus massoniana and P.elliottiiPinus elliottiiPinus massonianae1
Outcome
growthe1
Qualifier
could maintain high growth for six yearse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus elliottii
Pinus elliottii · TaxonMason Brock ( Masebrock ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pinus massoniana and P.elliottii behaved well which could maintain high growth for six years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquidambar formosana, Toona sinensis and Schima spp. were in a common state in the afforestation trial.

Taxon
Liquidambar formosana,Toona sinensis and Schima spp.SchimaLiquidambar formosanae2
Outcome
statee2
Qualifier
commone2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima
Schima · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)J.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Liquidambar formosana
Liquidambar formosana · TaxonYoiyoi_kancho · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The state of Liquidambar formosana,Toona sinensis and Schima spp.was common”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acermono maxim had low growth rate and was not suitable for fast-growing species.

Taxon
Acermono maxime2
Outcome
growth ratee2
Direction
lowe2
Qualifier
not suitable for fast-growing speciese2

Verbatim

e2

“the growth rate of Acermono maxim was low which was not suitable for fast-growing species and could be cultivated as ornamental species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–709 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Acermono maxim could be cultivated as an ornamental species.

Taxon
Acermono maxime2
Outcome
cultivated as ornamental speciese2

Verbatim

e2

“the growth rate of Acermono maxim was low which was not suitable for fast-growing species and could be cultivated as ornamental species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–709 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental adaptability of Symingtonia populnea and Rhodoleia championii was poor.

Taxon
Symingtonia populnea and Rhodoleia championiie3
Outcome
environmental adaptabilitye3
Direction
poore3

Verbatim

e3

“The environmental adaptability of Symingtonia populnea and Rhodoleia championii was poor,of which the survival rate and retentional rate were low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–856 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival rate and retention rate of Symingtonia populnea and Rhodoleia championii were low.

Taxon
Symingtonia populnea and Rhodoleia championiie3
Outcome
survival rate and retentional ratee3
Direction
lowe3

Verbatim

e3

“The environmental adaptability of Symingtonia populnea and Rhodoleia championii was poor,of which the survival rate and retentional rate were low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–856 · show in text ↑