Schima 17 claims

Claim · model-written summary

Schima in both regions had a high level of genetic variation within a given site.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae1

Outcome

genetic variation within a given sitee1

Verbatim

e1

“Schima in both regions had high level of genetic variation within a given site”

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic differentiation among sites in a region was low.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae1

Outcome

Genetic differentiations among sites in a regione2

Direction

lowe2

Verbatim

e1

“Schima in both regions had high level of genetic variation within a given site”

e2

“Genetic differentiations among sites in a region was low”

Claim · model-written summary

Some sites had a significantly different mean PCA score from other sites.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae1

Outcome

mean of PCA scorese3

Comparator

other sitese3

Verbatim

e1

“Schima in both regions had high level of genetic variation within a given site”

e3

“some sites had a significantly different mean of PCA scores from other sites”

Claim · model-written summary

Introducing seedlings from other sites in the same region may carry a low risk of genetic pollution.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae1

Treatment

introduction of seedlings from other sitese4

Outcome

risk of genetic pollutione4

Verbatim

e1

“Schima in both regions had high level of genetic variation within a given site”

e4

“The introduction of seedlings from other sites in the same region may have a low risk of genetic pollution”

Claim · model-written summary

Many mother trees should be prepared to maintain the variation within a site.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae1

Outcome

maintain the variation in a sitee5

Qualifier

many mother treese5

Verbatim

e1

“Schima in both regions had high level of genetic variation within a given site”

e5

“many mother trees should be prepared to maintain the variation in a site”

Claim · model-written summary

The first PCA scores separated Schima trees of Java from those of Amami without overlap.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae1

Outcome

first scores of PCAe6

Qualifier

without overlape6

Comparator

Amamie6

Verbatim

e1

“Schima in both regions had high level of genetic variation within a given site”

e6

“The first scores of PCA discriminated trees of Java from those of Amami without overlap”

Claim · model-written summary

Schima in West Java and Amami are probably different subspecies or species.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae7

Outcome

different subspecies or speciese7

Setting

West Java and Amamie7

Verbatim

e7

“Schima in West Java and Amami are probably different subspecies or species from each other”

Claim · model-written summary

Liquidambar formosana, Toona sinensis and Schima spp. were in a common state in the afforestation trial.

Taxon

Liquidambar formosana,Toona sinensis and Schima spp.SchimaLiquidambar formosanae2

Outcome

statee2

Qualifier

commone2

Verbatim

e2

“The state of Liquidambar formosana,Toona sinensis and Schima spp.was common”

Claim · model-written summary

Schima plantation biomass was 122.91 t/hm~2.

Taxon

SchimaSchimae0

Outcome

biomasse0

Value

122.91 t/hm~2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass and NPP were 176.03 t/hm~2 and 25.32 t/(hm~2·yr) for Acacia mangium plantation,122.91 t/hm~2 and 17.93 t/(hm~2·yr) for Schima plantation,and 104.93 t/hm~2 and 15.8 t/(hm~2·yr) for coniferous plantation,respectively.”

Claim · model-written summary

Schima plantation NPP was 17.93 t/(hm~2·yr).

Taxon

SchimaSchimae0

Outcome

NPPe0

Value

17.93 t/(hm~2·yr)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass and NPP were 176.03 t/hm~2 and 25.32 t/(hm~2·yr) for Acacia mangium plantation,122.91 t/hm~2 and 17.93 t/(hm~2·yr) for Schima plantation,and 104.93 t/hm~2 and 15.8 t/(hm~2·yr) for coniferous plantation,respectively.”