Paper · 2006 · PubMed

[Potential allelopathic effects of Piper nigrum, Mangifera indica and Clausena lansium].

Guijun Yan; Chaohua Zhu; Yanping Luo; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

With Piper nigrum, Mangifera indica and Clausena lansium as the donators, this paper studied their potential allelopathic effects on the germination and growth of Zea mays, Glycine max, Cucurbita moschata, Arachis hypogaea, Raphanus sativus, Echinochloa crusgalli, Digitaria sanguinalis and Stylosanthes guianensis. The results showed that the aqueous extracts of these donators could inhibit the germination and growth of Z. mays, G. max, C. moschata, E. crus-galli and D. sanguinalis at high concentration, but stimulate them at low concentration. In rhizosphere soil of P. nigrum and M. indica, the germination and growth of Z. mays L was stimulated, while A. hypogaea was inhibited. The aqueous extracts of the donators were extracted by ethyl acetate and n-butanol, respectively, and the inhibitory activity of both aqueous and n-butanol fractions from P. nigrum and M. indica on Z. mays, R. sativus and S. guianensis was stronger than that of ethyl acetate fraction, indicating that P. nigrum and M. indica contained the allelochemicals with high polarity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high concentration donor aqueous extracts inhibited germination and growth of Z. mays.

Taxon
Z. maysZea mayse0
Treatment
aqueous extracts of these donatorse0
Outcome
germination and growthe0
Direction
inhibite0
Qualifier
high concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous extracts of these donators could inhibit the germination and growth of Z. mays, G. max, C. moschata, E. crus-galli and D. sanguinalis at high concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low concentration the extracts stimulated those recipient plants.

Taxon
Z. maysZea mayse1
Treatment
low concentratione0
Outcome
stimulate theme0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but stimulate them at low concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Z. mays, G. max, C. moschata, E. crus-galli and D. sanguinalis at high concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. nigrum and M. indica rhizosphere soil stimulated Z. mays germination and growth.

Taxon
Z. mays LZea mayse0
Treatment
rhizosphere soil of P. nigrum and M. indicae0
Outcome
germination and growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rhizosphere soil of P. nigrum and M. indica, the germination and growth of Z. mays L was stimulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizosphere soil inhibited A. hypogaea.

Taxon
A. hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
A. hypogaea was inhibitede0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while A. hypogaea was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous and n-butanol fractions from P. nigrum and M. indica had stronger inhibition than ethyl acetate fraction.

Taxon
Z. maysZea mayse0
Treatment
aqueous and n-butanol fractionse0
Outcome
inhibitory activitye0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
ethyl acetate fractione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibitory activity of both aqueous and n-butanol fractions from P. nigrum and M. indica on Z. mays, R. sativus and S. guianensis was stronger than that of ethyl acetate fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–971 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The donors were inferred to contain high-polarity allelochemicals.

Taxon
P. nigrumPiper nigrume0
Compound
allelochemicalse0
Outcome
contained the allelochemicals with high polaritye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper nigrum
Piper nigrum · Taxonbreki74 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. nigrum and M. indica contained the allelochemicals with high polarity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1061 · show in text ↑

donor · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Mangifera indica · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Piper nigrum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.