Paper · 2004 · Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica

Pollen morphology of the Loranthaceae from China

Han Rong

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pollen morphology of 38 taxa of Loranthaceae from China, and of eight taxa from Indonesia and Australia was examined under light microscope (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Based on exine ornamentation characteristics, Loranthaceae can be subdivided into two groups that are consistent with the two tribes in the family: Elytrantheae and Lorantheae. In the tribe Elytrantheae, pollen grains with 3_syncolpate aperture and exine of blunt_tipped spines and striate ornamentation may represent the primitive type while those with diplocolporate and diplosyndemicolpate apertures are of derived nature. In the tribe Lorantheae, pollen grains with isopolarity, 3_syncolpate apertures, and granulate exine ornamentation may represent the primitive type, while those with heteropolarity, parasyndemicolpate_syndemicolpate, 3_colpate and colpate_brevicolpate or porate apertures, scabrate and indistinctly granulate ornamentation represent the derived state. Pollen data suggest three basic groups in the tribe Lorantheae according to the aperture and ornamentation characteristics: Group I is composed of Dendrophtho , Scurrula , Taxillus , and Tolypanthus ; Group II and Group III contain only Helixanthera and Loranthus respectively. Group I is relatively primitive in terms of pollen morphology. Among genera in Group I, there are only insignificant differences in pollen morphology between Taxillus and Scurrula , two genera with a close relationship; both Group II and Group III are relatively derived in terms of pollen morphology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exine features divided Loranthaceae into groups consistent with Elytrantheae and Lorantheae.

Taxon
LoranthaceaeLoranthaceaee0
Outcome
two groupse0
Value
two groupse0

Verbatim

e0

“Loranthaceae can be subdivided into two groups that are consistent with the two tribes in the family: Elytrantheae and Lorantheae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–361 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elytrantheae pollen with 3_syncolpate apertures and blunt-tipped spiny, striate exine may be primitive.

Taxon
ElytrantheaeElytrantheaee0
Organ / stage
pollen grainse0
Outcome
primitive typee0
Qualifier
3_syncolpate aperture and exine of blunt_tipped spines and striate ornamentatione0

Verbatim

e0

“In the tribe Elytrantheae, pollen grains with 3_syncolpate aperture and exine of blunt_tipped spines and striate ornamentation may represent the primitive type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–521 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elytrantheae pollen with diplocolporate or diplosyndemicolpate apertures was considered derived.

Taxon
ElytrantheaeElytrantheaee1
Outcome
derived naturee0
Qualifier
diplocolporate and diplosyndemicolpate aperturese0

Verbatim

e0

“those with diplocolporate and diplosyndemicolpate apertures are of derived nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Loranthaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Loranthaceae can be subdivided into two groups that are consistent with the two tribes in the family: Elytrantheae and Lorantheae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–361 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lorantheae pollen with isopolarity, 3_syncolpate apertures and granulate exine may be primitive.

Taxon
LorantheaeLorantheaee0
Outcome
primitive typee0
Qualifier
isopolarity, 3_syncolpate apertures, and granulate exine ornamentatione0

Verbatim

e0

“In the tribe Lorantheae, pollen grains with isopolarity, 3_syncolpate apertures, and granulate exine ornamentation may represent the primitive type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–758 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lorantheae pollen with heteropolarity, alternate apertures and scabrate or indistinct granulate ornamentation was considered derived.

Taxon
LorantheaeLorantheaee1
Outcome
derived statee0
Qualifier
heteropolarity, parasyndemicolpate_syndemicolpate, 3_colpate and colpate_brevicolpate or porate apertures, scabrate and indistinctly granulate ornamentatione0

Verbatim

e0

“those with heteropolarity, parasyndemicolpate_syndemicolpate, 3_colpate and colpate_brevicolpate or porate apertures, scabrate and indistinctly granulate ornamentation represent the derived state”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Loranthaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Loranthaceae can be subdivided into two groups that are consistent with the two tribes in the family: Elytrantheae and Lorantheae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group I of Lorantheae comprised Dendrophtho, Scurrula, Taxillus and Tolypanthus.

Taxon
LorantheaeLorantheaee1
Outcome
Group Ie0
Qualifier
Dendrophtho , Scurrula , Taxillus , and Tolypanthuse0

Verbatim

e0

“Group I is composed of Dendrophtho , Scurrula , Taxillus , and Tolypanthus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Loranthaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Loranthaceae can be subdivided into two groups that are consistent with the two tribes in the family: Elytrantheae and Lorantheae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group II contained only Helixanthera.

Taxon
HelixantheraHelixantherae0
Outcome
Group IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helixanthera
Helixanthera · TaxonDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Group II and Group III contain only Helixanthera and Loranthus respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1241 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group I was relatively primitive in pollen morphology.

Taxon
LorantheaeLorantheaee1
Outcome
relatively primitive in terms of pollen morphologye0

Verbatim

e0

“Group I is relatively primitive in terms of pollen morphology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Loranthaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Loranthaceae can be subdivided into two groups that are consistent with the two tribes in the family: Elytrantheae and Lorantheae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxillus and Scurrula had insignificant pollen morphological differences.

Taxon
TaxillusTaxilluse0
Outcome
differences in pollen morphologye0
Comparator
Scurrulae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxillus
Taxillus · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are only insignificant differences in pollen morphology between Taxillus and Scurrula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1421 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group II was relatively derived in pollen morphology.

Taxon
HelixantheraHelixantherae1
Outcome
relatively derived in terms of pollen morphologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helixanthera
Helixanthera · TaxonDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both Group II and Group III are relatively derived in terms of pollen morphology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Loranthaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Group II and Group III contain only Helixanthera and Loranthus respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1241 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group III was relatively derived in pollen morphology.

Taxon
LoranthusLoranthuse1
Outcome
relatively derived in terms of pollen morphologye0

Verbatim

e0

“both Group II and Group III are relatively derived in terms of pollen morphology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Loranthaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“Group II and Group III contain only Helixanthera and Loranthus respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1241 · show in text ↑