Paper · 2004 · Zhongguo tangliao

Effects of Applied Different Nitrogen Amounts on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet

QU Xiao-rong

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The nitrogen of applied different amounts has some effects on root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugar beet,the high root yield,sugar content and sugar yield were 35038kg/ha, 17.2% and 5073.0kg/ha respectively, when applied nitrogen 180 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet root yield was high at 35038 kg/ha when 180 kg/ha nitrogen was applied.

Treatment
applied nitrogen 180 kg/hae1
Outcome
root yielde1
Direction
highe1
Value
35038kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen of applied different amounts has some effects on root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“the high root yield,sugar content and sugar yield were 35038kg/ha, 17.2% and 5073.0kg/ha respectively, when applied nitrogen 180 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet sugar content was high, at 17.2%, when 180 kg/ha nitrogen was applied.

Treatment
applied nitrogen 180 kg/hae1
Outcome
sugar contente1
Direction
highe1
Value
17.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen of applied different amounts has some effects on root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“the high root yield,sugar content and sugar yield were 35038kg/ha, 17.2% and 5073.0kg/ha respectively, when applied nitrogen 180 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet sugar yield was high, at 5073.0 kg/ha, when 180 kg/ha nitrogen was applied.

Treatment
applied nitrogen 180 kg/hae1
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
highe1
Value
5073.0kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nitrogen of applied different amounts has some effects on root yield, sugar content and sugar yield of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“the high root yield,sugar content and sugar yield were 35038kg/ha, 17.2% and 5073.0kg/ha respectively, when applied nitrogen 180 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–252 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.