Abstract
The moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)in maize not only promotes the absorption to NPK, and enhances the fertilizer use efficiency of NPK (respectively increase 23 38%, 26 52%, 65 21%), but also increases the grain yield (increases 4 35%) and changes the grain quality The excessive application of Mo may inhibit the absorption of NPK and there was no good for the grain yield of maize The Mo supplying levels are positive correlativity with the content of total sugar, soluble sugar and fibre, but negative correlativity with the protein-N content of the plant and chlorophyll content of leaves at the seedling stage of maize
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Moderate Mo application promoted NPK absorption in maize.
- Treatment
- moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)e0
- Outcome
- absorption to NPKe0
- Direction
- promotese0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)in maize not only promotes the absorption to NPK, and enhances the fertilizer use efficiency of NPK (respectively increase 23 38%, 26 52%, 65 21%), but also increases the grain yield (increases 4 35%) and changes the grain quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Moderate Mo increased maize N fertilizer use efficiency by 23 38%.
- Treatment
- moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)e0
- Outcome
- fertilizer use efficiency of NPKe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 23 38%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)in maize not only promotes the absorption to NPK, and enhances the fertilizer use efficiency of NPK (respectively increase 23 38%, 26 52%, 65 21%), but also increases the grain yield (increases 4 35%) and changes the grain quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Moderate Mo increased maize P fertilizer use efficiency by 26 52%.
- Treatment
- moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)e0
- Outcome
- fertilizer use efficiency of NPKe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 26 52%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)in maize not only promotes the absorption to NPK, and enhances the fertilizer use efficiency of NPK (respectively increase 23 38%, 26 52%, 65 21%), but also increases the grain yield (increases 4 35%) and changes the grain quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Moderate Mo increased maize K fertilizer use efficiency by 65 21%.
- Treatment
- moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)e0
- Outcome
- fertilizer use efficiency of NPKe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 65 21%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)in maize not only promotes the absorption to NPK, and enhances the fertilizer use efficiency of NPK (respectively increase 23 38%, 26 52%, 65 21%), but also increases the grain yield (increases 4 35%) and changes the grain quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Moderate Mo increased maize grain yield by 4 35%.
- Treatment
- moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 4 35%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)in maize not only promotes the absorption to NPK, and enhances the fertilizer use efficiency of NPK (respectively increase 23 38%, 26 52%, 65 21%), but also increases the grain yield (increases 4 35%) and changes the grain quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Moderate Mo changed maize grain quality.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The moderate application of Mo(H 2MoO 4: 0 33 kg/ha)in maize not only promotes the absorption to NPK, and enhances the fertilizer use efficiency of NPK (respectively increase 23 38%, 26 52%, 65 21%), but also increases the grain yield (increases 4 35%) and changes the grain quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Excessive Mo may inhibit maize NPK absorption.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The excessive application of Mo may inhibit the absorption of NPK and there was no good for the grain yield of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Excessive Mo was unfavorable for maize grain yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The excessive application of Mo may inhibit the absorption of NPK and there was no good for the grain yield of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo supply was positive correlativity with maize total sugar.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Mo supplying levels are positive correlativity with the content of total sugar, soluble sugar and fibre, but negative correlativity with the protein-N content of the plant and chlorophyll content of leaves at the seedling stage of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo supply was positive correlativity with maize soluble sugar.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Mo supplying levels are positive correlativity with the content of total sugar, soluble sugar and fibre, but negative correlativity with the protein-N content of the plant and chlorophyll content of leaves at the seedling stage of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo supply was positive correlativity with maize fibre.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Mo supplying levels are positive correlativity with the content of total sugar, soluble sugar and fibre, but negative correlativity with the protein-N content of the plant and chlorophyll content of leaves at the seedling stage of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo supply was negative correlativity with maize protein-N content.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Mo supplying levels are positive correlativity with the content of total sugar, soluble sugar and fibre, but negative correlativity with the protein-N content of the plant and chlorophyll content of leaves at the seedling stage of maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo supply was negative correlativity with maize chlorophyll content.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Mo supplying levels are positive correlativity with the content of total sugar, soluble sugar and fibre, but negative correlativity with the protein-N content of the plant and chlorophyll content of leaves at the seedling stage of maize”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →molybdenum atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.