Paper · 2001 · Acta Tritical Crops

A Study on the Contribution of Different Organs to Grain Weight in Different Genotype Wheat

Wei Ai

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The contribution of different organs to grain weight in different genotype wheat were studied through the treatments of defoliate, darken ear and darken stem. The results were as follows: there were significant differences among different organs in the contribution to 1000 grain weight, and no significant differences among different genotypes, to the per ear grain weight, the difference among different organs and the mutual reaction between genotypes and organs was significant, among the genotypes ,it was not significant. The contribution to grain weight of different organs was related to plant height. In a range of plant height, with the accretion of ear area, the contribution of leaf to grain weight increased, and there was a decline trends in that of ear. There was a positive correlation between the contribution of sheath and ear area or plant height. The contribution of reserved substance of stems was negative correlation with the contribution of leaves. Plant height was positive correlation with 1000 grain weight, and negative correlation with the grain number per ear. Leaf area per stem was positive correlation with grain weight per ear. Ear area and grain weight per ear were positively correlation with grain number per ear.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organ contributions to 1000 grain weight differed significantly.

Organ / stage
different organse0
Outcome
contribution to 1000 grain weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences among different organs in the contribution to 1000 grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes did not differ significantly in contributions to 1000 grain weight.

Material
different genotypese0
Outcome
per ear grain weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences among different genotypes, to the per ear grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organ contributions to per ear grain weight differed significantly.

Organ / stage
different organse0
Outcome
per ear grain weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to the per ear grain weight, the difference among different organs and the mutual reaction between genotypes and organs was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by organ interaction for per ear grain weight was significant.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
mutual reaction between genotypes and organse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mutual reaction between genotypes and organs was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes did not differ significantly in per ear grain weight.

Outcome
genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among the genotypes ,it was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organ contribution to grain weight was related to plant height.

Organ / stage
different organse0
Outcome
contribution to grain weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contribution to grain weight of different organs was related to plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf contribution to grain weight increased as ear area increased within a plant height range.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
contribution of leaf to grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
In a range of plant heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a range of plant height, with the accretion of ear area, the contribution of leaf to grain weight increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear contribution declined as ear area increased within a plant height range.

Organ / stage
eare0
Outcome
that of eare0
Direction
declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the accretion of ear area, the contribution of leaf to grain weight increased, and there was a decline trends in that of ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheath contribution was positively correlated with ear area and plant height.

Organ / stage
sheathe0
Outcome
contribution of sheathe0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a positive correlation between the contribution of sheath and ear area or plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem reserve contribution was negatively correlated with leaf contribution.

Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
contribution of reserved substance of stemse0
Direction
negative correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contribution of reserved substance of stems was negative correlation with the contribution of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was positively correlated with 1000 grain weight.

Organ / stage
Plant heighte0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height was positive correlation with 1000 grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was negatively correlated with grain number per ear.

Organ / stage
Plant heighte0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
negative correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height was positive correlation with 1000 grain weight, and negative correlation with the grain number per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area per stem was positively correlated with grain weight per ear.

Organ / stage
Leaf area per steme0
Outcome
grain weight per eare0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area per stem was positive correlation with grain weight per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear area was positively correlated with grain number per ear.

Organ / stage
Ear areae0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
positively correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ear area and grain weight per ear were positively correlation with grain number per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight per ear was positively correlated with grain number per ear.

Organ / stage
grain weight per eare0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
positively correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ear area and grain weight per ear were positively correlation with grain number per ear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑