Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer

Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)

Xie Zhi-jia

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of different transplanting dates(5th,15thand25thof May) on the responses and correlations of flue-cured tobacco(FCT) seedlings to N fertilizer. The results show that when the transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof May,both the yield and N accumulated in leaves and stems were remarkably increased by 5. 1%- 6. 1%, 19. 8%- 55. 2%; the corresponding agronomic nitrogen use efficiency,physiological nitrogen use efficiency,soil nitrogen dependent rate and nitrogen harvest index were increased by 37. 4%- 49. 8%,30. 4%- 54. 8%,26. 9%- 29. 1% and 2. 9%-5. 7% respectively. Positively significant correlation were existed between postponed transplanting date and the indexes calculated such as agronomic nitrogen use efficiency,partial factor productivity for nitrogen fertilizer and soil nitrogen dependent rate; and also among these indexes. Therefore,postponing the transplanting date to 15th-25thin May is an effective way to improve tobacco yields and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponing transplanting from 5 May to 15 and 25 May increased tobacco yield by 5.1-6.1%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof Maye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5. 1%- 6. 1%e0
Comparator
5thof Maye0

Verbatim

e0

“when the transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof May,both the yield and N accumulated in leaves and stems were remarkably increased by 5. 1%- 6. 1%, 19. 8%- 55. 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponing transplanting increased nitrogen accumulated in leaves and stems by 19.8-55.2%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof Maye0
Outcome
N accumulated in leaves and stemse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19. 8%- 55. 2%e0
Comparator
5thof Maye0

Verbatim

e0

“when the transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof May,both the yield and N accumulated in leaves and stems were remarkably increased by 5. 1%- 6. 1%, 19. 8%- 55. 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponing transplanting increased agronomic nitrogen use efficiency by 37.4-49.8%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof Maye0
Outcome
agronomic nitrogen use efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
37. 4%- 49. 8%e1
Comparator
5thof Maye0

Verbatim

e0

“when the transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof May,both the yield and N accumulated in leaves and stems were remarkably increased by 5. 1%- 6. 1%, 19. 8%- 55. 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“the corresponding agronomic nitrogen use efficiency,physiological nitrogen use efficiency,soil nitrogen dependent rate and nitrogen harvest index were increased by 37. 4%- 49. 8%,30. 4%- 54. 8%,26. 9%- 29. 1% and 2. 9%-5. 7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponing transplanting increased physiological nitrogen use efficiency by 30.4-54.8%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof Maye0
Outcome
physiological nitrogen use efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
30. 4%- 54. 8%e1
Comparator
5thof Maye0

Verbatim

e0

“when the transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof May,both the yield and N accumulated in leaves and stems were remarkably increased by 5. 1%- 6. 1%, 19. 8%- 55. 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“the corresponding agronomic nitrogen use efficiency,physiological nitrogen use efficiency,soil nitrogen dependent rate and nitrogen harvest index were increased by 37. 4%- 49. 8%,30. 4%- 54. 8%,26. 9%- 29. 1% and 2. 9%-5. 7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponing transplanting increased soil nitrogen dependent rate by 26.9-29.1%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof Maye0
Outcome
soil nitrogen dependent ratee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26. 9%- 29. 1%e1
Comparator
5thof Maye0

Verbatim

e0

“when the transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof May,both the yield and N accumulated in leaves and stems were remarkably increased by 5. 1%- 6. 1%, 19. 8%- 55. 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“the corresponding agronomic nitrogen use efficiency,physiological nitrogen use efficiency,soil nitrogen dependent rate and nitrogen harvest index were increased by 37. 4%- 49. 8%,30. 4%- 54. 8%,26. 9%- 29. 1% and 2. 9%-5. 7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponing transplanting increased nitrogen harvest index by 2.9-5.7%.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof Maye0
Outcome
nitrogen harvest indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
2. 9%-5. 7%e1
Comparator
5thof Maye0

Verbatim

e0

“when the transplanting date were postponed from 5thof May to 15thand 25thof May,both the yield and N accumulated in leaves and stems were remarkably increased by 5. 1%- 6. 1%, 19. 8%- 55. 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“the corresponding agronomic nitrogen use efficiency,physiological nitrogen use efficiency,soil nitrogen dependent rate and nitrogen harvest index were increased by 37. 4%- 49. 8%,30. 4%- 54. 8%,26. 9%- 29. 1% and 2. 9%-5. 7% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Postponed transplanting date was positively correlated with agronomic nitrogen use efficiency, partial factor productivity and soil nitrogen dependent rate.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
postponed transplanting datee2
Outcome
agronomic nitrogen use efficiencye2
Direction
Positivelye2

Verbatim

e2

“Positively significant correlation were existed between postponed transplanting date and the indexes calculated such as agronomic nitrogen use efficiency,partial factor productivity for nitrogen fertilizer and soil nitrogen dependent rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Postponing transplanting to 15-25 May is an effective way to improve tobacco yields and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
postponing the transplanting date to 15th-25thin Maye3
Outcome
improve tobacco yields and nitrogen fertilizer efficiencye3

Verbatim

e3

“postponing the transplanting date to 15th-25thin May is an effective way to improve tobacco yields and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the correlations between transplanting date and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.