Paper · 2011 · Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu

Effects of nitrogen application rates and soil tillage modes on yield of spring maize and NO_3~- —N accumulation in soil profile

Liu She-ping

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on N application rates and soil tillage modes experiment,yield of spring maize and NO3——N accumulation in soil profile were studied in the northwest of Hebei Province.The results showed that compared with conventional tillage,no-tillage mode had no significant effect on yield of spring maize,through analyzing function curve of N rate and yield of spring maize under no-tillage 1,no-tillage 2 and conventional tillage modes,and the proper rate of N of spring maize was 192~209 kg/hm2,192~212 kg/hm2 and 196~216 kg/hm2 respectively.With the increase of N rate,NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm and 90~80 soil layers were also significantly increased by three treatments.NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layer under no-tillage mode was higher than that under conventional tillage in whole sampling period, and this trend increased with increase of N application rate.After maize was harvested,NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layer under no-tillage mode was significantly higher than that under conventional tillage mode,while NO3——N accumulation in 90~180 cm soil layer under conventional tillage mode was significantly higher than that under no-tillage mode,this indicated that more N nutrient accumulated in 0~90 cm soil layer under no-tillage mode and less leached into groundwater for environment pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage had no significant yield effect against conventional tillage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
no-tillage modee0
Outcome
yield of spring maizee0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with conventional tillage,no-tillage mode had no significant effect on yield of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–298 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proper nitrogen rate under no-tillage 1 was 192~209 kg/hm2.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
no-tillage 1e1
Outcome
proper rate of Ne0
Value
192~209 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proper rate of N of spring maize was 192~209 kg/hm2,192~212 kg/hm2 and 196~216 kg/hm2 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–537 · show in text ↑
e1

“no-tillage 1,no-tillage 2 and conventional tillage modes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proper nitrogen rate under no-tillage 2 was 192~212 kg/hm2.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
no-tillage 2e1
Outcome
proper rate of Ne0
Value
192~212 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proper rate of N of spring maize was 192~209 kg/hm2,192~212 kg/hm2 and 196~216 kg/hm2 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–537 · show in text ↑
e1

“no-tillage 1,no-tillage 2 and conventional tillage modes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proper nitrogen rate under conventional tillage was 196~216 kg/hm2.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
proper rate of Ne0
Value
196~216 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proper rate of N of spring maize was 192~209 kg/hm2,192~212 kg/hm2 and 196~216 kg/hm2 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–537 · show in text ↑
e1

“no-tillage 1,no-tillage 2 and conventional tillage modes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–430 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate significantly increased soil nitrate accumulation in both reported layers.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
increase of N ratee0
Outcome
NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm and 90~80 soil layerse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of N rate,NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm and 90~80 soil layers were also significantly increased by three treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage had higher 0–90 cm nitrate accumulation than conventional tillage throughout sampling.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
no-tillage modee0
Outcome
NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layer under no-tillage mode was higher than that under conventional tillage in whole sampling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rate strengthened the no tillage nitrate accumulation trend.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
increase of N application ratee0
Outcome
NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layere1
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this trend increased with increase of N application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layer under no-tillage mode was higher than that under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–784 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After harvest no tillage had significantly higher 0–90 cm nitrate than conventional tillage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
no-tillage modee0
Outcome
NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillage modee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After maize was harvested,NO3——N accumulation in 0~90 cm soil layer under no-tillage mode was significantly higher than that under conventional tillage mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After harvest conventional tillage had significantly higher 90–180 cm nitrate than no tillage.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
conventional tillage modee0
Outcome
NO3——N accumulation in 90~180 cm soil layere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no-tillage modee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO3——N accumulation in 90~180 cm soil layer under conventional tillage mode was significantly higher than that under no-tillage mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors inferred no tillage retained more nitrogen near the surface and reduced groundwater leaching.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
no-tillage modee0
Outcome
less leached into groundwatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more N nutrient accumulated in 0~90 cm soil layer under no-tillage mode and less leached into groundwater for environment pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.