Paper · 2008 · Seed

Effect of ~(60)Co-γRay on Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology

Wang Min

12
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

11 wheat varieties's dry seeds were radiated by ~(60)Co-γray.The results showed that one variety's germination energy,germination rate and germination index of treatment were significantly lower than those of control;7 varieties's length of buds of treatment were significantly or extreme significantly higher than those of control;11 varieties's length of root and activity index of treatment were significantly or extreme significantly lower than those of control;8 varieties's root/bud of treatment were significantly or extreme significantly lowe- rer than control;9 varieties's seedling rate of treatment was significantly lower than that of control. 9 varieties's plant survival rate of treatment was significantly lower than that of control.11 varieties's singal tiller rate,length of leaves,breadth of leaves,root length and winter tiller per plant of treatment were signifi- cantly lower than those of control.9 varieties's winter tiller per plant of treatment was significantly or extreme significantly lowerer than control;7 varieties's content of soluble protein of treatment was significantly or ex- treme significantly lower than control.6 varieties's content of propanedial of treatment was significantly or ex- treme significantly higher than control;10 varieties's content of POD enzyme were significantly or extreme sig- nificantly higher than those of control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat germination energy,germination rate and germination index relative to control in one variety.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
germination energy,germination rate and germination indexe0
Direction
significantly lowere0
Qualifier
one varietye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one variety's germination energy,germination rate and germination index of treatment were significantly lower than those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat length of buds relative to control in 7 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
length of budse0
Direction
significantly or extreme significantly highere0
Qualifier
7 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7 varieties's length of buds of treatment were significantly or extreme significantly higher than those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat length of root and activity index relative to control in 11 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
length of root and activity indexe0
Direction
significantly or extreme significantly lowere0
Qualifier
11 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11 varieties's length of root and activity index of treatment were significantly or extreme significantly lower than those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat root/bud relative to control in 8 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
root/bude0
Direction
significantly or extreme significantly lowe- rere0
Qualifier
8 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8 varieties's root/bud of treatment were significantly or extreme significantly lowe- rer than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat seedling rate relative to control in 9 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
seedling ratee0
Direction
significantly lowere0
Qualifier
9 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9 varieties's seedling rate of treatment was significantly lower than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat plant survival rate relative to control in 9 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
plant survival ratee0
Direction
significantly lowere0
Qualifier
9 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9 varieties's plant survival rate of treatment was significantly lower than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat singal tiller rate,length of leaves,breadth of leaves relative to control in 11 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
singal tiller rate,length of leaves,breadth of leavese0
Direction
signifi- cantly lowere0
Qualifier
11 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11 varieties's singal tiller rate,length of leaves,breadth of leaves,root length and winter tiller per plant of treatment were signifi- cantly lower than those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat root length and winter tiller per plant relative to control in 11 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
root length and winter tiller per plante0
Direction
signifi- cantly lowere0
Qualifier
11 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11 varieties's singal tiller rate,length of leaves,breadth of leaves,root length and winter tiller per plant of treatment were signifi- cantly lower than those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat winter tiller per plant relative to control in 9 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
winter tiller per plante0
Direction
significantly or extreme significantly lowerere0
Qualifier
9 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9 varieties's winter tiller per plant of treatment was significantly or extreme significantly lowerer than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat content of soluble protein relative to control in 7 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
content of soluble proteine0
Direction
significantly or ex- treme significantly lowere0
Qualifier
7 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7 varieties's content of soluble protein of treatment was significantly or ex- treme significantly lower than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat content of propanedial relative to control in 6 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
content of propanediale0
Direction
significantly or ex- treme significantly highere0
Qualifier
6 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 varieties's content of propanedial of treatment was significantly or ex- treme significantly higher than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation changed wheat content of POD enzyme relative to control in 10 varieties.

Treatment
~(60)Co-γrayt1
Outcome
content of POD enzymee0
Direction
significantly or extreme sig- nificantly highere0
Qualifier
10 varietiese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 varieties's content of POD enzyme were significantly or extreme sig- nificantly higher than those of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seed Germination,Seedling Growth and Physiology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
t1

“~(60)Co-γRay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑

cobalt atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cobalt atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.