Paper · 2014 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize

Zeng Ya

8
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective 】The effects of fertilizer synergist and fertilizers on maize dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient absorption were studied to provide references for downsizing production cost of maize and increasing maize yield. 【Method】In the pot experiment, fertilization amount of N,P and K was 0.368 g/kg, 0.235 and 0.350 g/kg,respectively. There was one conventional fertilizer treatment(T1) and five other treatments(T2-T6). Each treatment was added by two milliliter fertilizer synergist based on conventional fertilizer treatments(F1-F5). The grain, bract and straw were used to measure the maize nutritional ingredient contents,including total N, total P and total K. The nutrient uptake and utilization of maize were calculated. 【 Result 】 Compared with NPK conventional fertilization treat-ment T1, added fertilizer synergist made fresh corn shell weight increase by 12.0 to 17.50 g/pot with the increment ranging from 4.3% to 6.2%. Maize grain weight increased from 3.9% to 6.9%. Compared to the control, the increase range of dry matter accumulation was 4.97%-6.65%. Nitrogen nutrient absorption volume in various corn organs(straw,grain,husk+cob and root)under synergist treatments was superior to that of the control.(straw:20.60%-37.00%;grain :7.20%-13.15%; husk+cob :12.43%-30.94%;root: 3.13%-37.75%). Compared with single chemical fertilizer,nitrogen utilization rate of synergist treatment increased from 5.0% to 7.2%. 【Conclusion】Adding synergist to conventional fertilizer can markedly increase dry matter content and improve nitrogen utilization rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added fertilizer synergist increased fresh corn shell weight by 12.0 to 17.50 g/pot relative to NPK conventional fertilization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
added fertilizer synergiste1
Outcome
fresh corn shell weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
12.0 to 17.50 g/pote1
Comparator
NPK conventional fertilizatione1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with NPK conventional fertilization treat-ment T1, added fertilizer synergist made fresh corn shell weight increase by 12.0 to 17.50 g/pot with the increment ranging from 4.3% to 6.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added fertilizer synergist increased maize grain weight by 3.9% to 6.9% relative to NPK conventional fertilization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
added fertilizer synergiste1
Outcome
Maize grain weighte2
Direction
increasede2
Value
3.9% to 6.9%e2
Comparator
NPK conventional fertilizatione1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with NPK conventional fertilization treat-ment T1, added fertilizer synergist made fresh corn shell weight increase by 12.0 to 17.50 g/pot with the increment ranging from 4.3% to 6.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–946 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maize grain weight increased from 3.9% to 6.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added fertilizer synergist increased dry matter accumulation by 4.97% to 6.65% relative to the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
added fertilizer synergiste1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione2
Direction
increasee2
Value
4.97%-6.65%e2
Comparator
the controle2
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with NPK conventional fertilization treat-ment T1, added fertilizer synergist made fresh corn shell weight increase by 12.0 to 17.50 g/pot with the increment ranging from 4.3% to 6.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–946 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to the control, the increase range of dry matter accumulation was 4.97%-6.65%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synergist treatments increased nitrogen absorption in maize straw, with volume superior to the control at 20.60% to 37.00%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
strawe1
Treatment
synergist treatmentse1
Outcome
Nitrogen nutrient absorption volumee1
Direction
superiore1
Value
20.60%-37.00%e2
Comparator
the controle1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen nutrient absorption volume in various corn organs(straw,grain,husk+cob and root)under synergist treatments was superior to that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw:20.60%-37.00%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synergist treatments increased nitrogen absorption in maize grain, with volume superior to the control at 7.20% to 13.15%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
synergist treatmentse1
Outcome
Nitrogen nutrient absorption volumee1
Direction
superiore1
Value
7.20%-13.15%e2
Comparator
the controle1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen nutrient absorption volume in various corn organs(straw,grain,husk+cob and root)under synergist treatments was superior to that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain :7.20%-13.15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synergist treatments increased nitrogen absorption in maize husk and cob, with volume superior to the control at 12.43% to 30.94%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
husk+cobe1
Treatment
synergist treatmentse1
Outcome
Nitrogen nutrient absorption volumee1
Direction
superiore1
Value
12.43%-30.94%e2
Comparator
the controle1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen nutrient absorption volume in various corn organs(straw,grain,husk+cob and root)under synergist treatments was superior to that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“husk+cob :12.43%-30.94%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synergist treatments increased nitrogen absorption in maize root, with volume superior to the control at 3.13% to 37.75%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
synergist treatmentse1
Outcome
Nitrogen nutrient absorption volumee1
Direction
superiore1
Value
3.13%-37.75%e2
Comparator
the controle1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen nutrient absorption volume in various corn organs(straw,grain,husk+cob and root)under synergist treatments was superior to that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1235 · show in text ↑
e2

“root: 3.13%-37.75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synergist treatment increased the nitrogen utilisation rate by 5.0% to 7.2% relative to single chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
synergist treatmente1
Outcome
nitrogen utilization ratee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5.0% to 7.2%e1
Comparator
single chemical fertilizere1
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizer synergist on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen nutrient uptake in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with single chemical fertilizer,nitrogen utilization rate of synergist treatment increased from 5.0% to 7.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1440 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.