Paper · 2013 · Northern Horticulture

Control Effect of Organic Amendments on Tomato Root-knot Nematode

Ting Liu

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of six kinds of organic amendments(sesame meal,wheat bran,soybean meal,chicken maure,edible fungi residue,EM bacterial liquid) single or mixed with two kinds of traditional pesticids(10% Fuqiduo and 0.5% Avermectin) on the control effect of tomato root-knot nematode and on the tomato growth were investigated in the indoor pots.The results showed that sesame meal and wheat bran signle or mixd with pesticides had a significant control effect on root-knot nematode and could promote the growth of tomato,but wheat bran had an inhibition on the growth of tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame meal alone or mixed with pesticides significantly controlled tomato root-knot nematode.

Treatment
sesame meale0
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effect on root-knot nematodee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sesame meal and wheat bran signle or mixd with pesticides had a significant control effect on root-knot nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat bran alone or mixed with pesticides significantly controlled tomato root-knot nematode.

Treatment
wheat brane0
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
control effect on root-knot nematodee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sesame meal and wheat bran signle or mixd with pesticides had a significant control effect on root-knot nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame meal promoted tomato growth.

Treatment
sesame meale0
Outcome
growth of tomatoe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sesame meal and wheat bran signle or mixd with pesticides had a significant control effect on root-knot nematode and could promote the growth of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat bran was reported to promote tomato growth.

Treatment
wheat brane0
Outcome
growth of tomatoe0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sesame meal and wheat bran signle or mixd with pesticides had a significant control effect on root-knot nematode and could promote the growth of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat bran also inhibited tomato growth.

Treatment
wheat brane0
Outcome
growth of tomatoe0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat bran had an inhibition on the growth of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–572 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Triticum aestivum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Sesamum indicum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.