Paper · 2005 · Zhongguo yancao kexue

Effects of different fertilization methods and water-fertilizer conditioningon yield and quality of leaf tobacco

Ling Shou-jun

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The tests were carried out to study the effects of fertilization method and conditioning of water and fertilizer rates on yield and quality of leaf tobacco.The results showed that under the same rate of total nitrogen treatment,spraying fertilizer at the time of 10-15 days after transplanting and around the topping time respectively could promote leaf maturity and obtain high yield and quality of leaf tobacco significantly by balancing the nutrients and development of tobacco leaves,and ensuring carbon nitrogen metabolism.In this test,the best results were observed in the treatments of 20% at transplanting and 10%,10%,40% and 20% at the time of 10,20,30 and 50 days after transplanting respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer spraying after transplanting and around topping promoted tobacco leaf maturity.

Treatment
spraying fertilizer at the time of 10-15 days after transplanting and around the topping timee0
Outcome
leaf maturitye0
Direction
promotee0
Comparator
same rate of total nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the same rate of total nitrogen treatment,spraying fertilizer at the time of 10-15 days after transplanting and around the topping time respectively could promote leaf maturity and obtain high yield and quality of leaf tobacco significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

This fertilizer timing significantly raised tobacco yield and quality.

Treatment
spraying fertilizer at the time of 10-15 days after transplanting and around the topping timee0
Outcome
yield and quality of leaf tobaccoe0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
same rate of total nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the same rate of total nitrogen treatment,spraying fertilizer at the time of 10-15 days after transplanting and around the topping time respectively could promote leaf maturity and obtain high yield and quality of leaf tobacco significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–426 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best results came from the stated split fertilizer schedule.

Treatment
20% at transplanting and 10%,10%,40% and 20% at the time of 10,20,30 and 50 days after transplanting respectivelye0
Outcome
best resultse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best results were observed in the treatments of 20% at transplanting and 10%,10%,40% and 20% at the time of 10,20,30 and 50 days after transplanting respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–112 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

transplanting · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 125 positive, 14 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

135 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

transplanting · phenology · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · phenology · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.