Paper · 2010 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Comparing Application Methods for Boron Fertilizer on the Yield and Quality of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)

Muhammad Tariq; Ali Akbar; Lataf-ul-Haq; et al.

16
claims
44
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The present study is based on the hypothesis that different methods of supplying boron (B) may have different effects on the yield and quality performance of tobacco crop. A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra. Three different methods (i.e., foliar spray, soil application, and root dipping at the rates of 0.25 kg ha–1, 1 kg ha–1, and 0.5 mg B L–1, respectively) in the form of boric acid along with a control (where no B was applied) were used in a randomized complete block design and replicated four times. Results revealed that different methods of B application significantly affected tobacco yield, quality, and nutrient uptake compared to the control. Maximum leaf area of 707 cm2, green leaf yield of 18553 kg ha–1, cured leaf yield of 2314 kg ha–1, grade index of 79%, nicotine content of 2.54%, and sugar content of 18.35% were noted in the treatment plot where B was applied as a foliar spray; however, in a few cases, there was no significant difference found among different methods of B application. Chloride and potassium contents were not significantly affected by any method of B fertilization. The B fertilization increased the concentration of this element in tobacco leaf, and a maximum concentration of B 48.55 mg kg–1 was noted in the foliar spray treatment. Moreover, fertilizer-use efficiency for different methods of B application revealed that foliar spray is more efficient as compared to soil application and root-dipping methods. Nutrient ratios to B such as potassium (K) / B and chloride (Cl) / B considerably decreased in tobacco leaf with increases in the concentration of B in leaves. These ratios provided some indication of the interrelationship of B with these nutrients in tobacco plants. Results also revealed that K/B and Cl/B ratios closely correlated with the grade index of tobacco leaf, and good grades of tobacco were found to be at a K/B ratio of 682 and a Cl/B ratio of 148 under the experimental conditions. The overall results indicated that the B foliar spray at the rate of 0.25 kg ha–1 significantly increased the yield, quality, and the nutrient uptake by the tobacco crop under the prevailing conditions and was more effective than other methods of B application. Keywords: Fertilizer-use efficiencyfoliar sprayqualityratioroot dippingsoil applicationtobaccoyield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave the maximum leaf area (707 cm2).

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye1
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
707 cm2e1
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum leaf area of 707 cm2, green leaf yield of 18553 kg ha–1, cured leaf yield of 2314 kg ha–1, grade index of 79%, nicotine content of 2.54%, and sugar content of 18.35% were noted in the treatment plot where B was applied as a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave the maximum green leaf yield (18553 kg ha-1).

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye1
Outcome
green leaf yielde1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
18553 kg ha–1e1
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum leaf area of 707 cm2, green leaf yield of 18553 kg ha–1, cured leaf yield of 2314 kg ha–1, grade index of 79%, nicotine content of 2.54%, and sugar content of 18.35% were noted in the treatment plot where B was applied as a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave the maximum cured leaf yield (2314 kg ha-1).

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye1
Outcome
cured leaf yielde1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
2314 kg ha–1e1
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum leaf area of 707 cm2, green leaf yield of 18553 kg ha–1, cured leaf yield of 2314 kg ha–1, grade index of 79%, nicotine content of 2.54%, and sugar content of 18.35% were noted in the treatment plot where B was applied as a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave the maximum grade index (79%).

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye1
Outcome
grade indexe1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
79%e1
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum leaf area of 707 cm2, green leaf yield of 18553 kg ha–1, cured leaf yield of 2314 kg ha–1, grade index of 79%, nicotine content of 2.54%, and sugar content of 18.35% were noted in the treatment plot where B was applied as a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave the maximum nicotine content (2.54%).

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye1
Outcome
nicotine contente1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
2.54%e1
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum leaf area of 707 cm2, green leaf yield of 18553 kg ha–1, cured leaf yield of 2314 kg ha–1, grade index of 79%, nicotine content of 2.54%, and sugar content of 18.35% were noted in the treatment plot where B was applied as a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave the maximum sugar content (18.35%).

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye1
Outcome
sugar contente1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
18.35%e1
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum leaf area of 707 cm2, green leaf yield of 18553 kg ha–1, cured leaf yield of 2314 kg ha–1, grade index of 79%, nicotine content of 2.54%, and sugar content of 18.35% were noted in the treatment plot where B was applied as a foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray at 0.25 kg ha-1 significantly increased yield, quality and nutrient uptake, and was more effective than other B application methods.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
B foliar spray at the rate of 0.25 kg ha–1e2
Outcome
yield, quality, and the nutrient uptakee2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
under the prevailing conditionse2
Comparator
other methods of B applicatione2
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e2

“The overall results indicated that the B foliar spray at the rate of 0.25 kg ha–1 significantly increased the yield, quality, and the nutrient uptake by the tobacco crop under the prevailing conditions and was more effective than other methods of B application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2167–2427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different B application methods significantly affected tobacco yield, quality and nutrient uptake compared with the control.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
different methods of B applicatione3
Outcome
tobacco yield, quality, and nutrient uptakee3
Comparator
the controle3
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results revealed that different methods of B application significantly affected tobacco yield, quality, and nutrient uptake compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride and potassium contents were not significantly affected by any B fertilization method.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
any method of B fertilizatione4
Outcome
Chloride and potassium contentse4
Direction
not significantly affectede4
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e4

“Chloride and potassium contents were not significantly affected by any method of B fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B fertilization increased the B concentration in tobacco leaf.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Organ / stage
tobacco leafe5
Treatment
B fertilizatione5
Outcome
concentration of this element in tobacco leafe5
Direction
increasede5
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e5

“The B fertilization increased the concentration of this element in tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave the maximum leaf boron concentration (48.55 mg kg-1).

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye6
Outcome
concentration of Be6
Direction
maximume6
Value
48.55 mg kg–1e6
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e6

“a maximum concentration of B 48.55 mg kg–1 was noted in the foliar spray treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron spray gave higher fertilizer-use efficiency than soil application and root dipping.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
K-399e0
Treatment
foliar spraye7
Outcome
fertilizer-use efficiencye7
Direction
more efficiente7
Comparator
soil application and root-dipping methodse7
Setting
Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods of B fertilization on the yield, quality, and leaf composition of flue-cured Virginia tobacco (cv. K-399) in 2007 at the Pakistan Tobacco Research Station, Mansehra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–419 · show in text ↑
e7

“Moreover, fertilizer-use efficiency for different methods of B application revealed that foliar spray is more efficient as compared to soil application and root-dipping methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1668 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/B and Cl/B nutrient ratios decreased in tobacco leaf as leaf B concentration increased.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Organ / stage
tobacco leafe2
Outcome
Nutrient ratios to Be2
Direction
decreasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nutrient ratios to B such as potassium (K) / B and chloride (Cl) / B considerably decreased in tobacco leaf with increases in the concentration of B in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1828 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K/B and Cl/B ratios were closely correlated with the tobacco leaf grade index.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Organ / stage
tobacco leafe3
Outcome
grade indexe3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“K/B and Cl/B ratios closely correlated with the grade index of tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Good tobacco grades were found at a K/B ratio of 682.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome
good gradese7
Value
K/B ratio of 682e7
Qualifier
under the experimental conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e7

“good grades of tobacco were found to be at a K/B ratio of 682 and a Cl/B ratio of 148 under the experimental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2046–2165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Good tobacco grades were found at a Cl/B ratio of 148.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacumNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome
good gradese7
Value
Cl/B ratio of 148e7
Qualifier
under the experimental conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e7

“good grades of tobacco were found to be at a K/B ratio of 682 and a Cl/B ratio of 148 under the experimental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2046–2165 · show in text ↑

boron atom · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 92 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.