Paper · 2011

Effects of Wide-narrow Row Spacing Cultivation on Growth and Yield of Rice

Zhen‐Yu Du

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking rice variety of Song-122 as material,the field plot experiment was carried out to study effects of wide-narrow row spacing cultivation on growth and yield of rice.The results showed that tiller number,panicles number and grain weight were reduced in treatment of 70 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivation,these lead to its decrease in yield.There was no significant difference in the development and yield formation in treatment of 50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivation,and efficiency of transplant rice seedlings was increased,environment in the fields was improved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 70 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing reduced rice tiller number, panicle number and grain weight.

Treatment
70 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivatione1
Outcome
tiller number,panicles number and grain weighte1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Wide-narrow Row Spacing Cultivation on Growth and Yield of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“tiller number,panicles number and grain weight were reduced in treatment of 70 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 70 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing decreased rice yield.

Treatment
70 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivatione1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Wide-narrow Row Spacing Cultivation on Growth and Yield of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“tiller number,panicles number and grain weight were reduced in treatment of 70 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–317 · show in text ↑
e2

“these lead to its decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing caused no significant difference in rice development and yield formation.

Treatment
50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivatione3
Outcome
development and yield formatione3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Wide-narrow Row Spacing Cultivation on Growth and Yield of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was no significant difference in the development and yield formation in treatment of 50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing increased the efficiency of transplanted rice seedlings.

Treatment
50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivatione3
Outcome
efficiency of transplant rice seedlingse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Wide-narrow Row Spacing Cultivation on Growth and Yield of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was no significant difference in the development and yield formation in treatment of 50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–492 · show in text ↑
e4

“efficiency of transplant rice seedlings was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing improved the environment in the rice fields.

Treatment
50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivatione3
Outcome
environment in the fieldse5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Wide-narrow Row Spacing Cultivation on Growth and Yield of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was no significant difference in the development and yield formation in treatment of 50 cm-20 cm wide-narrow row spacing cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–492 · show in text ↑
e5

“environment in the fields was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–589 · show in text ↑

density · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 330 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.