Paper · 2013 · Journal of Xiamen University

Allelopathy of Invasive Plant Lantana camara on four Receiver Plants

Zhou Hai-chao

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lantana camara,Verbenaceae family,is one of the invasive alien plants.Previous study about the allelopathy of L.camara mainly focused on exudates from stem and leaf,however,few study analysed the allelopathy of root exudates.At present,with the increasing of L.camara invasion expands scales,the plant has been expanded into farmland gradually.The aims of this study is to determine the allelopathy of different concentrations of water extracts from L.camara leaf and root on the germination and seedling growth of Vigna radiata,Brassica campestris,Triticum aestivum and Oryza sativa.Different parts and concentrations of water extracts from L.camara had different allelopathic effects on four receiver plants.Except the lowest concentration(2 mg/mL) had slight facilitation effects,other higher concentrations(20,50,100,200 mg/mL)showed significant inhibition effects and the inhibition increased with concentrations.The sensitivity of water extracts from L.camara was different among four tested species,B.campestris was sensitive to allelopathy of L.camara,while O.sativa was not.This study gave theoretical support for improving the competitiveness of crops aroud L.camara,and also provide a scientific foundation for control of current invasions and prevention of future invasions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-concentration Lantana extract slightly facilitated germination and seedling growth of Vigna radiata.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
water extracts from L.camara leaf and roote2
Interactor
L.camaraLantana camarae2weed
Outcome
germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
facilitatione1
Value
2 mg/mLe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination and seedling growth of Vigna radiata,Brassica campestris,Triticum aestivum and Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“Except the lowest concentration(2 mg/mL) had slight facilitation effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–782 · show in text ↑
e2

“water extracts from L.camara leaf and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Lantana extract concentrations significantly inhibited receiver plant germination and growth, with inhibition increasing with concentration.

Taxon
Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae0
Treatment
water extracts from L.camara leaf and roote2
Interactor
L.camaraLantana camarae2weed
Outcome
germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
inhibitione1
Value
20,50,100,200 mg/mLe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination and seedling growth of Vigna radiata,Brassica campestris,Triticum aestivum and Oryza sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“other higher concentrations(20,50,100,200 mg/mL)showed significant inhibition effects and the inhibition increased with concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–917 · show in text ↑
e2

“water extracts from L.camara leaf and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica campestris was sensitive to Lantana allelopathy.

Interactor
L.camaraLantana camarae0weed
Outcome
sensitive to allelopathye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B.campestris was sensitive to allelopathy of L.camara”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oryza sativa was not sensitive to Lantana allelopathy.

Taxon
O.sativaOryza sativae1
Interactor
L.camaraLantana camarae1weed
Outcome
was note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lantana camara
Lantana camara · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while O.sativa was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“B.campestris was sensitive to allelopathy of L.camara,while O.sativa was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1082 · show in text ↑

Lantana camara · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 34 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

botanical · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 59 positive, 43 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.