Abstract
In order to study the effect of biogas manure on yield and fruit quality of strawberry in greenhouse,five treatment combinations were designed,which were CK without fertilizer;treatmentⅠwith 1 500kg/ha chemical fertilizer as basal fertilizer,urea as topdressing;treatmentⅡ,Ⅲ,Ⅳwith 60 000kg/ha biogas residue as basal fertilizer,40%,60%,80% biogas slurry as topdressing,respectively.The results showed that when biogas residue was used as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry was used as topdressing,the survival rate of strawberry plantlets reached up to 100%,plant growth was promoted,rotten fruit rate was reduced and the product performance was improved.In the aspect of yield,treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively,the economic benefit was significant.Overall,the color of strawberries was red brightly,rotten fruit rate was lower,and marketability was good with biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressing,especially with 60% biogas slurry spraying topdressing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Biogas residue and slurry yielded up to 100% plantlet survival.
- Taxon
- strawberry
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- biogas residue was used as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry was used as topdressinge0
- Outcome
- survival rate of strawberry plantletse0
- Direction
- reached up toe0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“when biogas residue was used as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry was used as topdressing,the survival rate of strawberry plantlets reached up to 100%”
Claim · model-written summary
Biogas residue and slurry promoted plant growth.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressinge1
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- promotede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant growth was promoted”
t0“Strawberry”
e1“the color of strawberries was red brightly,rotten fruit rate was lower,and marketability was good with biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressing”
Claim · model-written summary
Biogas residue and slurry reduced rotten fruit rate.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressinge1
- Outcome
- rotten fruit ratee1
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rotten fruit rate was reduced”
t0“Strawberry”
e1“the color of strawberries was red brightly,rotten fruit rate was lower,and marketability was good with biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressing”
Claim · model-written summary
Biogas residue and slurry improved product performance.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressinge1
- Outcome
- product performancee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the product performance was improved”
t0“Strawberry”
e1“the color of strawberries was red brightly,rotten fruit rate was lower,and marketability was good with biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressing”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment III yield reached 36 570 kg/ha, 103.2% more than CK.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- treatmentⅢe1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 36 570kg/hae1
- Qualifier
- 103.2%e1
- Comparator
- CKe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
t0“Strawberry”
e1“In the aspect of yield,treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment III yield exceeded treatment I by 15%.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- treatmentⅢe1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 15%e1
- Comparator
- treatmentⅠe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
t0“Strawberry”
e1“In the aspect of yield,treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment III yield exceeded treatment II by 13.1%.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- treatmentⅢe1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 13.1%e1
- Comparator
- Ⅱe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
t0“Strawberry”
e1“In the aspect of yield,treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment III yield exceeded treatment IV by 14.2%.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- treatmentⅢe1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- moree1
- Value
- 14.2%e1
- Comparator
- Ⅳe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
t0“Strawberry”
e1“In the aspect of yield,treatmentⅢ reached up to 36 570kg/ha,which was 103.2%,15%,13.1%,14.2% more than the CK,treatmentⅠ,ⅡandⅣ,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The biogas treatment had significant economic benefit.
- Taxon
- StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Outcome
- economic benefite0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the economic benefit was significant”
t0“Strawberry”
Claim · model-written summary
Biogas residue and slurry produced bright red strawberries, lower rotten fruit rate and good marketability.
- Taxon
- strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
- Treatment
- biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressinge0
- Outcome
- color of strawberriese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the color of strawberries was red brightly,rotten fruit rate was lower,and marketability was good with biogas residue as basal fertilizer,biogas slurry as topdressing”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · survival · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
137 papers more in this group
See all 141 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.