Paper · 2010 · Huazhong Nongye Daxue xuebao

Control Effects of 56% MCPA-Na SP on Three Weeds in Rice Field

Hongjun Zhang

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this paper,56% MCPA-Na SP(2-methyl-4-chloro-phenoxyacetic acid-Na salt powder) was applied to investigate the control effects of Monochoria vaginalis(Burm.F.),Cyperus difformis L.,Eclipta prostrata L.and the influence of weed control on nutrition and crop yield of rice.The results showed that 56% MCPA-Na SP had good control effects on broadleaves and sedge weeds.The overall quantitycontrol effects reached 85.50%-94.48% and the overall fresh control effects reached 88.20%-94.87%.The application of 56% MCPA-Na SP significantly reduced the weeds absorption of nutrition and water,resulting in prominent yield enhancing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall quantity control effect of 56% MCPA-Na SP on broadleaf and sedge weeds in rice reached 85.50%-94.48%.

Treatment
56% MCPA-Na SPe1
Interactor
broadleaves and sedge weedse1weed
Outcome
overall quantitycontrol effectse2
Direction
reachede2
Value
85.50%-94.48%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed that 56% MCPA-Na SP had good control effects on broadleaves and sedge weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–367 · show in text ↑
e2

“The overall quantitycontrol effects reached 85.50%-94.48%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–425 · show in text ↑
e4

“the influence of weed control on nutrition and crop yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall fresh control effect of 56% MCPA-Na SP on broadleaf and sedge weeds in rice reached 88.20%-94.87%.

Treatment
56% MCPA-Na SPe1
Interactor
broadleaves and sedge weedse1weed
Outcome
overall fresh control effectse5
Direction
reachede5
Value
88.20%-94.87%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed that 56% MCPA-Na SP had good control effects on broadleaves and sedge weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–367 · show in text ↑
e5

“the overall fresh control effects reached 88.20%-94.87%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–485 · show in text ↑
e4

“the influence of weed control on nutrition and crop yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

56% MCPA-Na SP significantly reduced the absorption of nutrition and water by weeds in rice fields.

Treatment
56% MCPA-Na SPe3
Interactor
weedse3weed
Outcome
weeds absorption of nutrition and watere3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The application of 56% MCPA-Na SP significantly reduced the weeds absorption of nutrition and water,resulting in prominent yield enhancing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624 · show in text ↑
e4

“the influence of weed control on nutrition and crop yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

56% MCPA-Na SP produced prominent rice yield enhancement by controlling weeds.

Treatment
56% MCPA-Na SPe3
Interactor
weedse3weed
Outcome
crop yielde4
Direction
yield enhancinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The application of 56% MCPA-Na SP significantly reduced the weeds absorption of nutrition and water,resulting in prominent yield enhancing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624 · show in text ↑
e4

“the influence of weed control on nutrition and crop yield of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–272 · show in text ↑

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.