Paper · 2009 · Anhui nongye kexue

Research on the Identification of the Pathogen of Jatropha curcas Powdery Mildew and its Chemical Control

Yuan RuiLing

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The scientific basis of the control of Jatropha curcas powdery mildew in production was provided.[Method] The pathogen of Jatropha curcas powdery mildew in the multiplication base of Jatropha curcas sapling in Yuanyang county in Yunnan province was identified through the microscope observation.[Results] The result showed that the pathogen was Oidium leucoconium Desm.The field experiment in the efficiency of a combination of fungicide preliminarily selected showed that the fungicide combination could promote the normal growth of tree and had obvious control effect on Jatropha curcas powdery mildew without the risk of damage to Jatropha curcas.Two applications of the fungicide combination were done at an interval of about 7 days when the disease was rapidly developed and the control effect could reach to 85.3%.The chemical treatment could significantly improve its growth without leaf-falling and with obviously branch-growing in January and fruiting in March.And the fungicide was no chemical damage to the tree.[Conclusion] The economic and effective approach of the control of the disease was provided.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The powdery mildew pathogen was identified as Oidium leucoconium Desm.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Interactor
Oidium leucoconium Desm.e0pathogen
Outcome
pathogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result showed that the pathogen was Oidium leucoconium Desm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide combination promoted normal tree growth.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcase0
Treatment
fungicide combinatione0
Outcome
normal growth of treee0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungicide combination could promote the normal growth of tree and had obvious control effect on Jatropha curcas powdery mildew without the risk of damage to Jatropha curcas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide combination had an obvious powdery mildew control effect.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcase0
Treatment
fungicide combinatione0
Outcome
Jatropha curcas powdery mildewe0
Direction
control effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungicide combination could promote the normal growth of tree and had obvious control effect on Jatropha curcas powdery mildew without the risk of damage to Jatropha curcas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two fungicide applications about 7 days apart achieved 85.3% disease control.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
Two applications of the fungicide combinatione0
Outcome
control effecte0
Value
85.3%e0
Qualifier
about 7 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two applications of the fungicide combination were done at an interval of about 7 days when the disease was rapidly developed and the control effect could reach to 85.3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatment significantly improved tree growth.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
chemical treatmente0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical treatment could significantly improve its growth without leaf-falling and with obviously branch-growing in January and fruiting in March.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatment prevented leaf fall.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
chemical treatmente0
Outcome
without leaf-fallinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical treatment could significantly improve its growth without leaf-falling and with obviously branch-growing in January and fruiting in March.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatment produced obvious branch growth in January.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
chemical treatmente0
Outcome
branch-growinge0
Direction
obviouslye0
Qualifier
Januarye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical treatment could significantly improve its growth without leaf-falling and with obviously branch-growing in January and fruiting in March.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatment was associated with fruiting in March.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
chemical treatmente0
Outcome
fruitinge0
Qualifier
Marche0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chemical treatment could significantly improve its growth without leaf-falling and with obviously branch-growing in January and fruiting in March.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide caused no chemical damage to the tree.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
no chemical damage to the treee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“And the fungicide was no chemical damage to the tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Jatropha curcasResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.