Paper · 2015

Effects of Mechanical Direct-sowing and Irrigation Mode on Root Characteristics and Yield of Rice

Cheng Jian-pin

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to verify the effects of mechanical direct-sowing and irrigation mode on rice root system characteristics and yield, the experiments of involving both mechanical direct-sowing modes and irrigation modes, such as water direct-sowing and conventional flooding mode(WF), water direct-sowing and and intermittent irrigation mode(WSW), dryland directsowing and conventional flooding mode(DF) and dryland direct-sowing and and intermittent irrigation mode(DSW) to compare with conventional transplanting and flooding irrigation(CK) were conducted in 2013 and in 2014, respectively, some rice paremeters, such as root system characteristics and yield were investigated. The results indicated that, in 2013, the actual yield of WF and WSW were increased by 7.3% and 5.3% than CK, respectively, but yield difference was not significant between dryland direct-sowing treatments and CK; the changed tendency of the actual yields was roughly same in 2014 as those in 2013. Mechanical direct-sowing mode and irrigation mode was good for rice roots extend and improved root activity,dryland direct-sowing mode could postpone leaf senility of the leaves in rice later stage of growth, which was condutive to saving-water in the case of increase or no significant cut yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WF increased actual rice yield by 7.3% relative to CK in 2013.

Treatment
WFe0
Outcome
actual yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.3%e0
Qualifier
in 2013e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2013, the actual yield of WF and WSW were increased by 7.3% and 5.3% than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WSW increased actual rice yield by 5.3% relative to CK in 2013.

Treatment
WSWe0
Outcome
actual yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.3%e0
Qualifier
in 2013e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2013, the actual yield of WF and WSW were increased by 7.3% and 5.3% than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dryland direct-sowing treatments had no significant yield difference from CK in 2013.

Treatment
dryland direct-sowing treatmentse0
Outcome
yield differencee0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield difference was not significant between dryland direct-sowing treatments and CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trend in actual rice yields was roughly the same in 2014 as in 2013.

Outcome
changed tendency of the actual yieldse0
Qualifier
in 2014e0
Comparator
2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the changed tendency of the actual yields was roughly same in 2014 as those in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical direct-sowing and irrigation modes favored rice root extension.

Treatment
Mechanical direct-sowing mode and irrigation modee0
Outcome
rice roots extende0
Direction
good fore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical direct-sowing mode and irrigation mode was good for rice roots extend and improved root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical direct-sowing and irrigation modes improved rice root activity.

Treatment
Mechanical direct-sowing mode and irrigation modee0
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical direct-sowing mode and irrigation mode was good for rice roots extend and improved root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dryland direct-sowing postponed leaf senility late in rice growth.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
dryland direct-sowing modee0
Outcome
leaf senilitye0
Direction
postponee0
Qualifier
later stage of growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dryland direct-sowing mode could postpone leaf senility of the leaves in rice later stage of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1177 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded these modes could save water while increasing or not significantly reducing yield.

Outcome
saving-watere0
Qualifier
increase or no significant cut yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was condutive to saving-water in the case of increase or no significant cut yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 · show in text ↑

transplanting · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

irrigation · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 28 positive, 12 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.