Paper · 2004

Influence of farming measures on population size of Myzus persicae and Aphidius gifuehsis in the early growth season in tobacco field

Hou Mao

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Influence of cultural practices on the population size of Myzus persicae(Sulzer) and Aphidius gifuehsis(Ashmead) in the early growth season was investigated in 5 types of tobacco fields. Plastic film mulch and cropping pattern both exhibited significant influence on the population size of M. persicae in the early season. Tobacco field near peach orchard was infected with significantly higher aphid population (4 220 ± 747.9 /100 plants) than the other four types of fields; namely, simple cropped un-mulched (2116.0 ± 880.7 /100 plants), intercropped un-mulched (880.0 ± 244.0 /100 plants), simple cropped mulched (696.0 ± 328.8 /100 plants), intercropped mulched (408.0 ± 198.3 /100 plants) fields. Film mulch also significantly affected the population size of A. gifuehsis in the early season. Wasp population was higher in film-mulched fields (104.0 ± 62.3 /100 plants and 64.0 ± 38.5 /100 plants for simple cropping and intercropping, respectively) than in un-mulched fields (32.0 ± 26.8 /100 plants and 32.0 ± 17.9 /100 plants for simple cropping and intercropping, respectively). Therefore, film mulch is effective in both decreasing population of M. persicae and increasing population of A. gifuehsis. Intercropping is also effective in checking population of M. persicae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film mulch and cropping pattern significantly influenced early-season Myzus persicae population size.

Treatment
Plastic film mulch and cropping patterne0
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
population size of M. persicaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic film mulch and cropping pattern both exhibited significant influence on the population size of M. persicae in the early season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The aphid population near a peach orchard was significantly higher than in the four other field types.

Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
4 220 ± 747.9 /100 plantse0
Comparator
the other four types of fieldse0
Setting
near peach orcharde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco field near peach orchard was infected with significantly higher aphid population (4 220 ± 747.9 /100 plants) than the other four types of fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulch significantly affected early-season Aphidius gifuehsis population size.

Treatment
Film mulche0
Interactor
A. gifuehsise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population size of A. gifuehsise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Film mulch also significantly affected the population size of A. gifuehsis in the early season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wasp populations were higher in film-mulched than un-mulched fields.

Treatment
film-mulched fieldse0
Interactor
Waspe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Wasp populatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
un-mulched fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wasp population was higher in film-mulched fields (104.0 ± 62.3 /100 plants and 64.0 ± 38.5 /100 plants for simple cropping and intercropping, respectively) than in un-mulched fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulch decreased Myzus persicae population.

Treatment
film mulche0
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
population of M. persicaee0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“film mulch is effective in both decreasing population of M. persicae and increasing population of A. gifuehsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulch increased Aphidius gifuehsis population.

Treatment
film mulche0
Interactor
A. gifuehsise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population of A. gifuehsise0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“film mulch is effective in both decreasing population of M. persicae and increasing population of A. gifuehsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping checked Myzus persicae population.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
population of M. persicaee0
Direction
checkinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping is also effective in checking population of M. persicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–127 · show in text ↑

mulching · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · Myzus persicae · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.