Paper · 2019 · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Intercropping oilseed rape as a potential relay crop for enhancing the biological control of green peach aphids and aphid‐transmitted virus diseases

Rongquan Lai; Hanqing Hu; Xiaoting Wu; et al.

10
claims
31
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tobacco viruses transmitted by green peach aphids, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), cause severe disease in flue‐cured tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L. (Solanaceae), in China and throughout the world. Field experiments were conducted in 2016 and 2017 in Longyan City, Fujian Province, China, to determine whether M. persicae and aphid‐transmitted virus diseases are affected by intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields. The results showed that, compared with those in monocultured fields, the densities of M. persicae and winged aphids in intercropped fields significantly decreased in both 2016 and 2017. In particular, the appearance of winged aphids was delayed by ca. 7 days. Moreover, the densities of Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), a parasitoid of the aphid, significantly increased in 2016 and 2017. Accordingly, the incidence rates of aphid‐transmitted virus diseases (those caused by the cucumber mosaic virus, potato virus Y, and tobacco etch virus) significantly decreased in the intercropped fields in 2016 and 2017. Tobacco yields and monetary value significantly increased in 2016 (by 10–25 and 14–29%, respectively) and 2017 (by 17–22 and 22–34%, respectively). Consequently, our results suggest that intercropping oilseed rape in tobacco fields is a good approach to regulating and controlling aphids and tobacco mosaic viruses, for example potyvirus, and this intercropping can help control aphid‐transmitted virus diseases in tobacco.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced M. persicae density relative to monoculture in both years.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Interactor
M. persicaeMyzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
densities of M. persicaee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
both 2016 and 2017e0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with those in monocultured fields, the densities of M. persicae and winged aphids in intercropped fields significantly decreased in both 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue‐cured tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced winged aphid density relative to monoculture in both years.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Interactor
winged aphidse0pest
Outcome
densities of M. persicae and winged aphidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with those in monocultured fields, the densities of M. persicae and winged aphids in intercropped fields significantly decreased in both 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–667 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue‐cured tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winged aphids appeared about seven days later in intercropped fields.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Interactor
winged aphidse0pest
Outcome
appearance of winged aphidse0
Direction
delayede0
Value
ca. 7 dayse0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the appearance of winged aphids was delayed by ca. 7 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–741 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with those in monocultured fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue‐cured tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased Aphidius gifuensis density in both years.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Interactor
Aphidius gifuensisAphidius gifuensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
densities of Aphidius gifuensise0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the densities of Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), a parasitoid of the aphid, significantly increased in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“monocultured fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue‐cured tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced aphid transmitted virus disease incidence in both years.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Interactor
cucumber mosaic viruscucumber mosaic cucumoviruse0pathogen
Second interactor
potato virus YPotato virus Ye0pathogen
Outcome
incidence rates of aphid‐transmitted virus diseasese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
tobacco etch viruse0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Potato virus Y
Potato virus Y · Second interactorMahmoud Hamdy Abd El-Aziz, Plant Pathology Institute, Agricultural. Research Center, Alexandria, Egyp · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence rates of aphid‐transmitted virus diseases (those caused by the cucumber mosaic virus, potato virus Y, and tobacco etch virus) significantly decreased in the intercropped fields in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“monocultured fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“flue‐cured tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield increased 10–25% in 2016 under intercropping.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Outcome
Tobacco yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10–25e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco yields and monetary value significantly increased in 2016 (by 10–25 and 14–29%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“monocultured fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco monetary value increased 14–29% in 2016.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Outcome
monetary valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14–29%e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco yields and monetary value significantly increased in 2016 (by 10–25 and 14–29%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“monocultured fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield increased 17–22% in 2017.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Outcome
Tobacco yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17–22e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco yields and monetary value significantly increased in 2016 (by 10–25 and 14–29%, respectively) and 2017 (by 17–22 and 22–34%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1261 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“monocultured fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco monetary value increased 22–34% in 2017.

Treatment
intercropping of oilseed rapee1
Outcome
monetary valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22–34%e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Comparator
monocultured fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco yields and monetary value significantly increased in 2016 (by 10–25 and 14–29%, respectively) and 2017 (by 17–22 and 22–34%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1261 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae), in tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–481 · show in text ↑
e2

“monocultured fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–550 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend oilseed rape intercropping to control aphids and aphid transmitted virus disease in tobacco.

Treatment
intercropping oilseed rapee0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
control aphid‐transmitted virus diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping oilseed rape in tobacco fields is a good approach to regulating and controlling aphids and tobacco mosaic viruses, for example potyvirus, and this intercropping can help control aphid‐transmitted virus diseases in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1537 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · Myzus persicae · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.