Paper · 1998 · Madras Agricultural Journal

STUDIES ON THE CULTURAL AND CHEMICAL CONTROL OF BROOMRAPE IN TOBACCO

KANDASAMY O.S; RAJA D; CHANDRASEKHAR C.N

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Three field experiments were carried out as on-farm research in the cultivators field to control the broomrape (Orabanche cernual..) in tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum L.) by growing the trap crops of broomrape as intercrop, by swabbing broomrape shoots with oils and application of herbicides. The trap crops grown as intercrop with tobacco did not prove useful in reducing the broomrape infestation. Swabbing the broomrape shoots before flowering with organic and mineral oils caused around 70 per cent reduction in broomrape shoots. The herbicides did not affect the broomrape germination and shoot growth appreciably. Plant hole application of either coppersulphate 5 per cent solution or powdered neem cake at 100 or 200 kg/ha considerably reduced broomrape infestation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap crops intercropped with tobacco did not usefully reduce broomrape infestation.

Treatment
trap crops grown as intercrope0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape infestatione0
Direction
did not prove useful in reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trap crops grown as intercrop with tobacco did not prove useful in reducing the broomrape infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Swabbing broomrape with organic and mineral oils before flowering reduced its shoots around 70 per cent.

Treatment
Swabbing the broomrape shoots before flowering with organic and mineral oilse0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape shootse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Swabbing the broomrape shoots before flowering with organic and mineral oils caused around 70 per cent reduction in broomrape shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides did not appreciably affect broomrape germination and shoot growth.

Treatment
herbicidese0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape germination and shoot growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicides did not affect the broomrape germination and shoot growth appreciably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-hole coppersulphate solution considerably reduced broomrape infestation.

Treatment
coppersulphate 5 per cent solutione0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape infestatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant hole application of either coppersulphate 5 per cent solution or powdered neem cake at 100 or 200 kg/ha considerably reduced broomrape infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-hole powdered neem cake at 100 kg/ha considerably reduced broomrape infestation.

Treatment
powdered neem cake at 100 or 200 kg/hae0
Interactor
broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
broomrape infestatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant hole application of either coppersulphate 5 per cent solution or powdered neem cake at 100 or 200 kg/ha considerably reduced broomrape infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.