Paper · 2017 · AIP conference proceedings

The effectiveness of habitat modification schemes for enhancing beneficial insects: Assessing the importance of trap cropping management approach

Indah Trisnawati; Abdul Azis

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Many farms in regions of intensive crop production lack the habitats that historically provided resources to beneficial insects, and this lack has compromised the ability of farmers to rely on natural enemies for pest control. One of the strategies to boost populations of existing or naturally occurring beneficial insects is to supply them with appropriate habitat and alternative food sources, such as diversifying trap crop systems and plant populations in or around fields include perennials and flowering plants. Trap cropping using insectary plant that attracts beneficial insects as natural enemies, especially flowering plants, made for provision of habitat for predators or parasitoids that are useful for biological control. Perimeter trap cropping (PTC) is a method of integrated pest management in which the main crop is surrounded with a perimeter trap crop that is more attractive to pests. We observed PTC habitat modification and conventionaly-managed tobacco farms in Purwosari Village, Pasuruan (East Java) to evaluate the effectiveness of habitat modification management prescription (perimeter trap crop using flowering plant Crotalaria juncea) on agroecosystem natural enemies. Field tests were conducted in natural enemies (predator and parasitoid) abundance dynamic and diversity on tobacco field in Purwoasri, Pasuruan. Yellow pan trap, sweep net and hand collecting methods were applied in each 10 days during tobacco growth stage (vegetative, generative until reproductive/harvesting. The results showed that application perimeter trap crop with C. juncea in tobacco fields able to help arthropod conservation of natural enemies on all tobacco growth stages. These results were evidenced the increase in abundance of predators and parasitoids and the increased value of the Diversity Index (H’) and Evenness Index (EH) in all tobacco growth phases. Composition of predator and parasitoid in the habitat modification field were more diverse than in the conventional field. Three specific predator species were found on habitat modification field, i.e.: Crocothemis servilia, Orthetrum sabina and Paratrechina sp., as well as specific parasitoid species, i.e.: Polistes sp. (vegetative stage), Chloromyia sp., Theronia sp., Sarcophaga sp. and Cletus sp (generative stage), Condylodtylus sp., Trichogramma sp. (reproductive stage). Trends in predator abundance toward parasitoid insects were indicated a positive linear trend, with the abundance of predator on habitat modification field has an influence on the level of 67.1% parasitoid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perimeter trap cropping with C. juncea increased predator and parasitoid abundance in tobacco fields.

Organ / stage
all tobacco growth stagese0
Treatment
perimeter trap crop with C. junceae0
Outcome
abundance of predators and parasitoidse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application perimeter trap crop with C. juncea in tobacco fields able to help arthropod conservation of natural enemies on all tobacco growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1684 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in abundance of predators and parasitoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The diversity and evenness indices increased in modified tobacco fields across growth phases.

Organ / stage
all tobacco growth phasese1
Treatment
habitat modification fielde2
Outcome
Diversity Index (H’) and Evenness Index (EH)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
conventional fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tobacco fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1600 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased value of the Diversity Index (H’) and Evenness Index (EH) in all tobacco growth phases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1874 · show in text ↑
e2

“habitat modification field were more diverse than in the conventional field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–1997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator and parasitoid composition was more diverse in modified tobacco fields than conventional fields.

Treatment
habitat modification fielde1
Outcome
Composition of predator and parasitoide1
Direction
more diversee1
Comparator
conventional fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on tobacco field in Purwoasri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“Composition of predator and parasitoid in the habitat modification field were more diverse than in the conventional field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1876–1997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several predator and parasitoid species occurred specifically in habitat modification fields at different tobacco growth stages.

Outcome
specific predator species were found on habitat modification fielde1
Qualifier
specific parasitoid speciese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during tobacco growth stage (vegetative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1468 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three specific predator species were found on habitat modification field, i.e.: Crocothemis servilia, Orthetrum sabina and Paratrechina sp., as well as specific parasitoid species, i.e.: Polistes sp. (vegetative stage), Chloromyia sp., Theronia sp., Sarcophaga sp. and Cletus sp (generative stage), Condylodtylus sp., Trichogramma sp. (reproductive stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1999–2354 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator abundance showed a positive linear association with parasitoid abundance in modified tobacco fields, with a reported 67.1% influence.

Outcome
parasitoide1
Direction
positive linear trende1
Value
67.1%e1
Qualifier
abundance of predator on habitat modification fielde1
Setting
habitat modification fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on tobacco field in Purwoasri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trends in predator abundance toward parasitoid insects were indicated a positive linear trend, with the abundance of predator on habitat modification field has an influence on the level of 67.1% parasitoid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2356–2561 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.