Paper · 2007 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Effect of application rates of rape seed cake on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco

Fu Li

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of application rate of rape seed cake on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco.The results show that output yield and value of flue-cured tobacco are highest at 25% N from rape seed cake and 75% N from compound fertilizer.However,output yield and value of flue-cured tobacco decrease when N application rate from rape seed cake is above 25% of total applied N.With the same application amount,output yield and value of fluecured tobacco in rotten rape seed cake treatment are higher than those in unprocessed rape seed cake.It is also observed that flue-cured tobacco leaf chemical quality balances well at 25% rotten rape seed cake,plus 75% compound fertilizer treatments.At 100% rape seed cake(rotten or unprocessed rape seed cake) or 100% chemical fertilizer treatment,flue-cured tobacco leaf chemical quality becomes very unbalanced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield and value were highest with 25% N from rape seed cake and 75% from compound fertilizer.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
25% N from rape seed cake and 75% N from compound fertilizere0
Outcome
output yield and valuee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“output yield and value of flue-cured tobacco are highest at 25% N from rape seed cake and 75% N from compound fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield and value declined when rape seed cake provided above 25% of N.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
above 25% of total applied Ne0
Outcome
output yield and valuee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
25%e0

Verbatim

e0

“output yield and value of flue-cured tobacco decrease when N application rate from rape seed cake is above 25% of total applied N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the same amount, rotten rape seed cake gave higher tobacco yield and value than unprocessed cake.

Taxon
fluecured tobaccoe0
Treatment
rotten rape seed cake treatmente0
Outcome
output yield and valuee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unprocessed rape seed cakee0

Verbatim

e0

“With the same application amount,output yield and value of fluecured tobacco in rotten rape seed cake treatment are higher than those in unprocessed rape seed cake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chemical quality was balanced with 25% rotten cake and 75% compound fertilizer.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
25% rotten rape seed cake,plus 75% compound fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf chemical qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“flue-cured tobacco leaf chemical quality balances well at 25% rotten rape seed cake,plus 75% compound fertilizer treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chemical quality was unbalanced with 100% rape seed cake.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
100% rape seed cakee0
Outcome
leaf chemical qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“At 100% rape seed cake(rotten or unprocessed rape seed cake) or 100% chemical fertilizer treatment,flue-cured tobacco leaf chemical quality becomes very unbalanced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chemical quality was unbalanced with 100% chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
100% chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf chemical qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“At 100% rape seed cake(rotten or unprocessed rape seed cake) or 100% chemical fertilizer treatment,flue-cured tobacco leaf chemical quality becomes very unbalanced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–887 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Brassica napus · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

103 papers: 85 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

139 papers: 125 positive, 14 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

135 papers more in this group

See all 139 papers →

fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 187 positive, 27 negative or no effect

186 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.