Paper · 2014 · Guangdong nongye kexue

Physiological response of Humata tyermanni to water stress

Liang Xiao-hu

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effects of osmotic stress of polyethylene glycol 6000(PEG6000) with different concentrations on the leaf morphology, free proline content, soluble sugar content, POD activity and relative electric conductivity of Humata tyermanni were studied, using PEG6000 to manual simulated drought stress. The results showed that osmotic stress of 10%,20% and 30% PEG6000 caused different degrees of damage to the plant morphology, the injury effect of 30% PEG6000was most severe and the leaf withered seriously. Besides, the free proline content, soluble sugar content, POD activity,relative electric conductivity were postively correlated with stress concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30% PEG6000 osmotic stress caused the most severe injury to Humata tyermanni leaves, which withered seriously.

Taxon
Humata tyermanniDavallia tyermaniie2
Treatment
30% PEG6000e0
Outcome
injury effecte0
Direction
most severee0
Qualifier
the leaf withered seriouslye0
Comparator
10%,20%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Davallia tyermanii
Davallia tyermanii · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the injury effect of 30% PEG6000was most severe and the leaf withered seriously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“osmotic stress of 10%,20% and 30% PEG6000 caused different degrees of damage to the plant morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–422 · show in text ↑
e2

“relative electric conductivity of Humata tyermanni were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Free proline content, soluble sugar content and POD activity of Humata tyermanni were positively correlated with PEG stress concentration.

Taxon
Humata tyermanniDavallia tyermaniie2
Treatment
stress concentratione3
Outcome
free proline content, soluble sugar content, POD activitye3
Direction
postively correlatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Davallia tyermanii
Davallia tyermanii · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“relative electric conductivity of Humata tyermanni were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“the free proline content, soluble sugar content, POD activity,relative electric conductivity were postively correlated with stress concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–658 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative electric conductivity of Humata tyermanni was positively correlated with stress concentration.

Taxon
Humata tyermanniDavallia tyermaniie2
Treatment
stress concentratione3
Outcome
relative electric conductivitye3
Direction
postively correlatede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Davallia tyermanii
Davallia tyermanii · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“relative electric conductivity of Humata tyermanni were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–246 · show in text ↑
e3

“the free proline content, soluble sugar content, POD activity,relative electric conductivity were postively correlated with stress concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–658 · show in text ↑