Paper · 2008 · Zhongguo shuidao kexue

Effects of Four Pesticides and Their Mixtures on Grain Filling of Rice Guanglingxiangjing

Guoqing Yang

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of four pesticides commonly used in rice field and their mixtures on rice grain growth were studied by using a grain growth equation.ANOVA showed that maximum growth value(K),initial growth power(R0)and accumulative weight of dry matter during active growth stage(GT)for superior grain were not significantly different among all treatments.Multiple comparisons showed that GTs of rice treated with bisultap at 675 g/hm2 and the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage(150 g/hm2 jinggangmycin + 45 g/hm2 imidacloprid + 675 g/hm2 bisultap + 300 g/hm2 tricyclazole)were significantly greater than that of 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid,but not significantly different compared to control.In general,for low dosages of three pesticides,jinggangmycin,bisultap and imidacloprid,and their mixtures,there was no significant impact on superior grain growth,but significant on inferior grain growth.K for control was maxmium in all the pesticide treatments,and that for the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage was minimum.In addition,GT for 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid and the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage was significantly less than that of control.Mixture application of the four pesticides at high dosage had a significant negative effect on inferior grain filling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Superior grain maximum growth value did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
maximum growth value(K)e0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum growth value(K),initial growth power(R0)and accumulative weight of dry matter during active growth stage(GT)for superior grain were not significantly different among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Superior grain initial growth power did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
initial growth power(R0)e0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum growth value(K),initial growth power(R0)and accumulative weight of dry matter during active growth stage(GT)for superior grain were not significantly different among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Superior grain active growth dry matter accumulation did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
accumulative weight of dry matter during active growth stage(GT)for superior graine0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum growth value(K),initial growth power(R0)and accumulative weight of dry matter during active growth stage(GT)for superior grain were not significantly different among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bisultap at 675 g/hm2 gave greater superior grain GT than 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid.

Treatment
bisultap at 675 g/hm2e0
Outcome
GTse0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Comparator
22.5 g/hm2 imidaclopride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GTs of rice treated with bisultap at 675 g/hm2 and the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage(150 g/hm2 jinggangmycin + 45 g/hm2 imidacloprid + 675 g/hm2 bisultap + 300 g/hm2 tricyclazole)were significantly greater than that of 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High dose four pesticide mixture gave greater superior grain GT than 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid.

Treatment
the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage(150 g/hm2 jinggangmycin + 45 g/hm2 imidacloprid + 675 g/hm2 bisultap + 300 g/hm2 tricyclazole)e0
Outcome
GTse0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Comparator
22.5 g/hm2 imidaclopride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GTs of rice treated with bisultap at 675 g/hm2 and the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage(150 g/hm2 jinggangmycin + 45 g/hm2 imidacloprid + 675 g/hm2 bisultap + 300 g/hm2 tricyclazole)were significantly greater than that of 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two treatments did not differ from control for superior grain GT.

Treatment
bisultap at 675 g/hm2e1
Outcome
GTse1
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not significantly different compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–695 · show in text ↑
e1

“GTs of rice treated with bisultap at 675 g/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low pesticide doses and mixtures had no significant effect on superior grain growth.

Treatment
low dosages of three pesticides,jinggangmycin,bisultap and imidacloprid,and their mixturese0
Outcome
superior grain growthe0
Direction
no significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for low dosages of three pesticides,jinggangmycin,bisultap and imidacloprid,and their mixtures,there was no significant impact on superior grain growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low pesticide doses and mixtures significantly affected inferior grain growth.

Treatment
low dosages of three pesticides,jinggangmycin,bisultap and imidacloprid,and their mixturese0
Outcome
inferior grain growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for low dosages of three pesticides,jinggangmycin,bisultap and imidacloprid,and their mixtures,there was no significant impact on superior grain growth,but significant on inferior grain growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had maximum inferior grain K across treatments.

Outcome
Ke0
Direction
maxmiume0
Comparator
all the pesticide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K for control was maxmium in all the pesticide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high dose four pesticide mixture had minimum inferior grain K.

Treatment
the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosagee0
Outcome
Ke1
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that for the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage was minimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“K for control was maxmium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid at 22.5 g/hm2 reduced inferior grain GT relative to control.

Treatment
22.5 g/hm2 imidaclopride0
Outcome
GTe0
Direction
significantly lesse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GT for 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid and the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage was significantly less than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High dose four pesticide mixture reduced inferior grain GT relative to control.

Treatment
the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosagee0
Outcome
GTe0
Direction
significantly lesse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GT for 22.5 g/hm2 imidacloprid and the mixture of the four pesticides at high dosage was significantly less than that of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Guanglingxiangjing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.